Kronenberger Rosenfeld
General
Cases7
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
DesignCommunicationsSemicond., Optic
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 08/15/24 | MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Equitable Relief - Dkt. 125 - (One Day Extension) by Kaotica Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration of Geyer in Support, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Geyer Decl, # 4 Proposed Order)(Machleidt, Dario) QC Email: Proposed Orders not permitted on the docket. (anh). (Entered: 08/15/2024) | |
| 08/15/24 | MOTION to Alter Judgment - Motion for Equitable Relief by Kaotica Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration of Geyer in Support, # 3 Table of Contents of Geyer Decl Exhibits, # 4 Exhibit 1 to Geyer Decl, # 5 Exhibit 2 to Geyer Decl, # 6 Proposed Order)(Machleidt, Dario) QC Email: Proposed Orders not permitted on the docket. (anh). (Entered: 08/15/2024) | |
| 08/15/24 | NOTICE of VACATED Hearing - Bill of Costs, re 118 Bill of Costs, filed by Kaotica Corporation : The hearing set for 8/21/2024 at 10:30AM is Vacated pending resolution of MOTION to Amend/Correct 116 Clerk's Judgment Under Rule 52(b) for Findings and Conclusions re Equitable Issues by Iconic Mars Corporation [Doc. No. 123 ]. Once resolved, the Clerk will reset the hearing. (no document attached) (anh) (Entered: 08/15/2024) | |
USCA Case Number 2022-1816 for [63] Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit filed by Kaotica IP Corp. (akr) | ||
| 05/23/22 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 48 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this is action is dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and causes of action against Brownstone Resources, LLC and Modern Life Trend and dismissed without prejudice as to John/Jane Doe 1-10, each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Preliminary Injunction is dissolved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. (es) (Entered: 05/23/2022) | |
| 05/23/22 | Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Ontel Products Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Caloiaro, Steven) (Entered: 05/23/2022) |