Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases7

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

ferguson-case

fcoplaw.com

Practice Areas

Transport., E-Comm.DesignSemicond., Optic

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/15/24	Houweling Intellectual Properties Inc v. Copperstate Farms LLC 3:22-CV-08122 ( D. AZ )	Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Mountain High Greenhouse Construction LLC. (DXD) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
08/03/23	Halsey v. Next Level Racing Simulation Pty Ltd 4:22-CV-01431 ( N.D. CA )	[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order For Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive Confidential Information and/or Trade Secrets filed by Next Level Racing Simulation Pty, Ltd., Bryan K Halsey. (Wan, Jessica) (Filed on 8/3/2023) Modified on 8/4/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/03/2023)
08/03/23	Halsey v. Next Level Racing Simulation Pty Ltd 4:22-CV-01431 ( N.D. CA )	Stipulation to Take Depositions After the Close of Fact Discovery filed by Next Level Racing Simulation Pty, Ltd., Bryan K Halsey. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order on Stipulation to Take Certain Depositions After The Close of Fact Discovery)(Wan, Jessica) (Filed on 8/3/2023) Modified on 8/4/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/4/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/03/2023)
08/03/23	Halsey v. Next Level Racing Simulation Pty Ltd 4:22-CV-01431 ( N.D. CA )	*DISREGARD, SEE RE-FILED DOCUMENT AT DOCKET ENTRY 71 * Stipulation to Take Depositions After the Close of Fact Discovery filed by Next Level Racing Simulation Pty, Ltd., Bryan K. Halsey. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wan, Jessica) (Filed on 8/3/2023) Modified on 8/4/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/4/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 08/03/2023)
06/30/23	Koros USA Inc v. Gabriel Koros 2:21-CV-07450 ( C.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT STATUS REPORT JOINT REPORT RE ARBITRATION filed by Defendant Gabriel Koros. (Khosla, Abhay) (Entered: 06/30/2023)
12/29/20	Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co v. Genncomm LLC 2:20-CV-02849 ( C.D. CA )	Damages
12/29/20	Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co v. Genncomm LLC 2:20-CV-02849 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Final Judgment) (lom) (Entered: 12/29/2020)
12/29/20	Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Co v. Genncomm LLC 2:20-CV-02849 ( C.D. CA )	FINAL JUDGMENT 49 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court hereby enters Judgment as follows: BHTB's claims for declaratory relief are dismissed with prejudice.GennComm's counterclaims for breach of contract are dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered for GennComm on its counterclaim for infringement. BHTB will pay to GennComm a lump sum of $420,000 (the "Reasonable Royalty") for its infringement of GennComm's Patents through April 28, 2020, with $150,000 of that amount paid no later than January 4, 2021, another $37,500 paid no later than February 15, 2021, and the remainder paid in monthly installments of $9,300/month for 25 months on the first day of each month starting on March 1, 2021. If either of the first two payments are late, all monthly installments shall be deemed due as of February 28, 2021. The Reasonable Royalty agreed to by the Parties is based on representations and warranties provided by BHTB to GennComm regarding BHTB's past sales. GennComm can seek to modify the Judgment to increase the Reasonable Royalty if an audit reveals that BHTB's past sales are higher than the amount represented by BHTB in the settlement agreement. Each side to bear its own fees and costs. See judgment for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) (Entered: 12/29/2020) FINAL JUDGMENT 49 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court hereby enters Judgment as follows: BHTB's claims for declaratory relief are dismissed with prejudice.GennComm's counterclaims for breach of contract are dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered for GennComm on its counterclaim for infringement. BHTB will pay to GennComm a lump sum of $420,000 (the "Reasonable Royalty") for its infringement of GennComm's Patents through April 28, 2020, with $150,000 of that amount paid no later than January 4, 2021, another $37,500 paid no later than February 15, 2021, and the remainder paid in monthly installments of $9,300/month for 25 months on the first day of each month starting on March 1, 2021. If either of the first two payments are late, all monthly installments shall be deemed due as of February 28, 2021. The Reasonable Royalty agreed to by the Parties is based on representations and warranties provided by BHTB to GennComm regarding BHTB's past sales. GennComm can seek to modify the Judgment to increase the Reasonable Royalty if an audit reveals that BHTB's past sales are higher than the amount represented by BHTB in the settlement agreement. Each side to bear its own fees and costs. See judgment for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) (Entered: 12/29/2020)
12/26/19	Advantek Marketing Inc v. Shanghai Walk Long Tools Co Ltd 2:16-CV-03061 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/21/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order re Motion to Compel)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 12/26/2019)
12/23/19	Advantek Marketing Inc v. Shanghai Walk Long Tools Co Ltd 2:16-CV-03061 ( C.D. CA )	OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Infringement Claims 88 filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Statement of Disputed Facts, # 2 Declaration of Jaye G. Heybl ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Heybl Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Heybl Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 3 to Heybl Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 4 to Heybl Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 5 to Heybl Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 6 to Heybl Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 7 to Heybl Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 8 to Heybl Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 9 to Heybl Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 10 to Heybl Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 11 to Heybl Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 12 to Heybl Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 13 to Heybl Declaration, # 16 Exhibit 14 to Heybl Declaration, # 17 Exhibit 15 to Heybl Declaration, # 18 Exhibit 16 to Heybl Declaration, # 19 Exhibit 17 to Heybl Declaration, # 20 Declaration of Joe Pomerantz ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 21 Declaration of Lisa Melara ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 22 Exhibit 1 to Melara Declaration)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 12/23/2019) OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Infringement Claims 88 filed by Plaintiff Advantek Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Statement of Disputed Facts, # 2 Declaration of Jaye G. Heybl ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Heybl Declaration, # 4 Exhibit 2 to Heybl Declaration, # 5 Exhibit 3 to Heybl Declaration, # 6 Exhibit 4 to Heybl Declaration, # 7 Exhibit 5 to Heybl Declaration, # 8 Exhibit 6 to Heybl Declaration, # 9 Exhibit 7 to Heybl Declaration, # 10 Exhibit 8 to Heybl Declaration, # 11 Exhibit 9 to Heybl Declaration, # 12 Exhibit 10 to Heybl Declaration, # 13 Exhibit 11 to Heybl Declaration, # 14 Exhibit 12 to Heybl Declaration, # 15 Exhibit 13 to Heybl Declaration, # 16 Exhibit 14 to Heybl Declaration, # 17 Exhibit 15 to Heybl Declaration, # 18 Exhibit 16 to Heybl Declaration, # 19 Exhibit 17 to Heybl Declaration, # 20 Declaration of Joe Pomerantz ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 21 Declaration of Lisa Melara ISO Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgement, # 22 Exhibit 1 to Melara Declaration)(Train, Tyler) (Entered: 12/23/2019)