Law Offices Of Daniel W Roberts

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases12

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufChemicalDesign

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
05/17/21	Green v. Yavruyan 4:20-CV-00052 ( S.D. IN )	FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT in the above-entitled matter. Ruling is in favor of Defendants, Ara Yavruyan and Chain Vault Inc., and this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/17/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC) (Entered: 05/17/2021)
05/17/21	Green v. Yavruyan 4:20-CV-00052 ( S.D. IN )	ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS - Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (Filing No. 29 ), is GRANTED. Greens pending Motions (Filing No. 35 ; Filing No. 37 ) are DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED. Final judgment will issue by separate order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/17/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC) (Entered: 05/17/2021)
12/01/20	Williams & Lake LLC v. Genesis Systems LLC 4:17-CV-00117 ( D. AZ )	ORDER granting [235] Stipulation of Dismissal. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 11/30/2020. (DLC) (Entered: 12/01/2020)
11/30/20	Williams & Lake LLC v. Genesis Systems LLC 4:17-CV-00117 ( D. AZ )	STATUS REPORT "Second" Regarding Settlement by Williams & Lake LLC. (Rost, Bradshaw) (Entered: 11/30/2020)
11/30/20	Williams & Lake LLC v. Genesis Systems LLC 4:17-CV-00117 ( D. AZ )	STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice, each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs by Williams & Lake LLC. (Rost, Bradshaw) (Entered: 11/30/2020)
07/10/19	Emed Tech Corp v. Repro Med Systems 1:18-CV-05880 ( S.D. NY )	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. . Document filed by Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products. (Attachments: # 1 Defendants Rule 56.1 Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts In Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement)(Isackson, Robert) (Entered: 07/10/2019)
08/30/19	Emed Tech Corp v. Repro Med Systems 1:18-CV-05880 ( S.D. NY )	OPINION AND ORDER re: 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. filed by Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products. The 576 patent relates to a device that sheaths a medical needle within a protective pair of folding wings during and after the removal of the needle from the patients skin. Defendant moves for summary judgment of non-infringement as to claims 1 through 3 of the 576 patent. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 135 and close the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/30/2019) (cf) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. (Entered: 08/30/2019) OPINION AND ORDER re: 135 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. filed by Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products. The 576 patent relates to a device that sheaths a medical needle within a protective pair of folding wings during and after the removal of the needle from the patients skin. Defendant moves for summary judgment of non-infringement as to claims 1 through 3 of the 576 patent. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the foregoing reasons, Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 135 and close the case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/30/2019) (cf) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. (Entered: 08/30/2019)
06/04/20	EMED Tech Corporation v Repro-Med Systems, Inc 2:15-CV-01167 ( E.D. TX )	USCA ORDER - FEDERAL CIRCIIT ORDER filed. The court construes the "Dismissal Agreement" [59] as a motion to withdraw the petition. The motion is granted. The Petition [57] is withdrawn. Issuing mandate (FEDERAL CIRCUIT - 19-2145)(ch, ).