Helsell Fetterman LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases10

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

helsell-fetterman

helsell.com

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufComp. Arch. and SoftwareBiotech

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/26/21	Informative Technology Systems LLC v. Axinom Corp 2:21-CV-01594 ( W.D. WA )	CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management LLC for Informative Technology Systems. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Informative Technology Systems (Holloway, Brian) (Entered: 11/26/2021)
11/26/21	Informative Technology Systems LLC v. Axinom Corp 2:21-CV-01594 ( W.D. WA )	COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Axinom Corporation with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7347395), filed by Informative Technology Systems. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120) Report on Patent- AO120, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet ITS v. Axinom, # 5 Summons)(Holloway, Brian) (Entered: 11/26/2021)
11/26/21	Informative Technology Systems LLC v. Axinom Corp 2:21-CV-01594 ( W.D. WA )	Initial Civil Docket 11-26-2021
10/01/21	James M Green v. Monrovia Nursery Co 2:18-CV-05257 ( C.D. CA )	ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Defendant Monrovia Nursery Company and against Cecil M. Green, James M. Green, Rita M. Green in the principal amount of $ 0.00, interest in the amount of $ 0.00, attorneys fees of $ 190,210.09, costs of $ 0.00. RE: Order 68 . (jp) (Entered: 10/01/2021)
03/15/21	Big Baboon Inc v. SAP America Inc 4:17-CV-02082 ( N.D. CA )	Order by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr GRANTING Dkt. No. [131] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Court finds that withdrawal will cause no apparent prejudice to Plaintiff because: (1) the case is substantively over, with judgment entered on April 24, 2019, Dkt. No. [87] , and the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment on September 2, 2020, Dkt. No. [122] . (2) The only ongoing issues pertain to enforcement by Defendant of the attorneys fees judgment against Plaintiff. (3) Plaintiff's deposition was taken on February 9, 2021 with Charles Wong as president and designated representative of Plaintiff. (4) Mr. Wong was able to retain counsel to represent him in his personal capacity and that counsel defended him at the deposition. (5) It is not clear what else will happen in this case. And (6) there has been no particularized showing of how withdrawal would cause Plaintiff any prejudice. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021) Order by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr GRANTING Dkt. No. [131] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Court finds that withdrawal will cause no apparent prejudice to Plaintiff because: (1) the case is substantively over, with judgment entered on April 24, 2019, Dkt. No. [87] , and the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment on September 2, 2020, Dkt. No. [122] . (2) The only ongoing issues pertain to enforcement by Defendant of the attorneys fees judgment against Plaintiff. (3) Plaintiff's deposition was taken on February 9, 2021 with Charles Wong as president and designated representative of Plaintiff. (4) Mr. Wong was able to retain counsel to represent him in his personal capacity and that counsel defended him at the deposition. (5) It is not clear what else will happen in this case. And (6) there has been no particularized showing of how withdrawal would cause Plaintiff any prejudice. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021)