Hutchison & Steffen
General
Cases35
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Comp. Arch. and SoftwareMech Eng, ManufSoftware, Security
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 05/24/22 | COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANVDC-6915586) by Allegiant Travel Company. Proof of service due by 8/22/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Index, # 3 Exhibit A - Correspondence 2021 between R2 and Allegiant, # 4 Exhibit B - Mutual Confidentiality Agreement, # 5 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 7,698,329, # 6 Exhibit D - U.S. Patent No. 8,190,610, # 7 Exhibit E - U.S. Patent No. 8,307,029, # 8 Exhibit F - U.S. Patent No. 8,527,623, # 9 Exhibit G - U.S. Patent No. 9,558,175, # 10 Exhibit H - U.S. Patent No. 10,176,272, # 11 Exhibit I - U.S. Patent No. 8,341,157, # 12 Summons) (Hicks, Patrick)
NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. (Entered: 05/24/2022) | |
| 05/25/22 | Initial Civil Docket 05-24-2022 | |
| 10/01/21 | ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Defendant Monrovia Nursery Company and against Cecil M. Green, James M. Green, Rita M. Green in the principal amount of $ 0.00, interest in the amount of $ 0.00, attorneys fees of $ 190,210.09, costs of $ 0.00. RE: Order 68 . (jp) (Entered: 10/01/2021) | |
| 03/15/21 | Order by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr GRANTING Dkt. No. [131] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Court finds that withdrawal will cause no apparent prejudice to Plaintiff because: (1) the case is substantively over, with judgment entered on April 24, 2019, Dkt. No. [87] , and the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment on September 2, 2020, Dkt. No. [122] . (2) The only ongoing issues pertain to enforcement by Defendant of the attorneys fees judgment against Plaintiff. (3) Plaintiff's deposition was taken on February 9, 2021 with Charles Wong as president and designated representative of Plaintiff. (4) Mr. Wong was able to retain counsel to represent him in his personal capacity and that counsel defended him at the deposition. (5) It is not clear what else will happen in this case. And (6) there has been no particularized showing of how withdrawal would cause Plaintiff any prejudice. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2021) | |
| 03/31/20 | Costs |