Bayramoglu Law Offices
General
Cases35
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
DesignSemicond., OpticCommunications
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
11/01/24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants SaitenUS, Viginsul-US, ronghsdus20, Songxin Products, WSTOO, qingdaodangrandianzikejiyouxiangongsi, Qingsong tiyu, guiersi, Snorkeling Collector-US, Gintenco-US by David Silver (Silver, David) (Entered: 11/01/2024) | |
11/01/24 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shenzhen Xinsenlin Technology Co., Ltd. Under Rule 41(a)(1) DALEEF (Defendant 1) and Smith's-Tool (Defendant 8) with prejudice (Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 11/01/2024) | |
10/18/24 | DECLARATION of David Silver regarding motion for temporary restraining order,,,, [9] , terminate deadlines,,,,,,,,, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings,,,,,,,, [13] , complaint [1] RE: SERVICE OF COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND THIS COURTS MINUTE ORDER (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of David Silver, # [2] Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of David Silver)(Silver, David) (Entered: 10/18/2024) | |
10/15/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: In light of the allegations made by the parties in their briefings on this motion that the opposing party has made material misrepresentations and engaged in misconduct during the course of this case, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [25] is continued for determination of whether there has been violation(s) of Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 11(b), the court may sanction a party who presents to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paperwhether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocatingthat is presented for any improper purpose, present frivolous arguments, or is unsupported by evidence. Here, Plaintiff alleges in their reply [30] and response to Defendant's sur-reply [35] that Defendant has engaged in conduct in violation of the Court's TRO. Defendant alleges in their sur-reply that Plaintiff misrepresented their knowledge of and relationship to the Defendant in filing their complaint and motion for TRO [32] . Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an in-person status hearing is set for 11/5/2024 at 9:45 a.m. for parties to substantiate these claims of misconduct and misrepresentation and show cause as to why the conduct has not violated Rule 11(b). Parties are to file individual memoranda regarding these claims within three business days of the status hearing. Once this issue is fully briefed, the Court will take under advisement the possibility of Rule 11 sanctions as well as Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. Mailed notice. (ym) (Entered: 10/15/2024) | |
08/28/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng: The Court has reviewed the parties' 8/27/2024 joint status report 113, which indicates the parties have reached a settlement and are working to finalize the settlement agreement. By 9/19/2024, the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal or a joint status report with an update regarding when the dismissal will be filed. All matters relating to the referral having concluded, the referral is terminated. All discovery deadlines are stricken. Mailed notice. (kl, ) (Entered: 08/28/2024) | |
08/23/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting [38] Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 8/23/2024. (voc) (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
08/23/24 | ** TEXT ONLY ORDER **ORDER granting 38 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anita M. Boor on 8/23/2024. (voc) (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
08/23/24 | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report by an Additional Two Weeks by Plaintiff Millennium Outdoors, LLC. (Gregor, Jennifer) Modified on 8/23/2024. (lak) (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
08/15/24 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS (DKT. 92 ); PLAINTIFF XIANGSHAN ZHANG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 97 ; and DEFENDANT VIVOSUN, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 98 ) are CONTINUED to September 30, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., with the precise time to be determined once the calendar issues for that date. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 10C. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/15/2024) | |
06/27/24 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge P. Casey Pitts: Initial Case Management Conference held on 6/27/2024 via Zoom webinar. Status Conference set for 8/22/2024 at 02:00 PM - Videoconference Only before Judge P. Casey Pitts. Status Report due by 8/8/2024.Total Time in Court: 3 min (2:05 - 2:08 PM). Court Reporter: Lee-Anne Shortridge. Plaintiff Attorney: John Steger, David Tsai. Defendant Attorney: Shawn Mangano (not present). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (nmc, COURT USER) (Date Filed: 6/27/2024) (Entered: 06/27/2024) |