Entralta PLLC
General
Cases4
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Transport., E-Comm.Software, SecurityCommunications
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 04/18/24 | Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (klw) (Entered: 04/18/2024) | |
| 04/18/24 | FINAL JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw) (Entered: 04/18/2024) | |
| 04/18/24 | ORDER ADOPTING Magistrate's 31 Report and Recommendations. ORDER GRANTING IN PART pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3). Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (klw) (Entered: 04/18/2024) | |
| 08/04/23 | REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (et) (Entered: 08/04/2023) | |
| 08/03/23 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. On July 26, 2023, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Required Copyright, Patent, and Trademark Reporting Requirements (ECF 7 ). On August 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a response to the Order to Show Cause (ECF 10 ). The Court deems the response satisfactory and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (clee) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/03/2023) | |
| 08/03/23 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Inomed Techonologies Inc.. (Weinstein, Peter) (Entered: 08/03/2023) | |
| 01/10/22 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). RE: 9 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) (Entered: 01/10/2022) | |
| 12/15/21 | JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Pursuant to this Court's Order Dismissing Action Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) 10, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) (Entered: 12/15/2021) | |
| 12/15/21 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m). The Court ordered Plaintiff LifeProxy, LLC to show cause why the action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve Defendant eSnipe Inc. within the time allotted for service. OSC, ECF No. 9 . Plaintiff did not file a response. The Court dismisses the action without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close the case. (lc) (Entered: 12/15/2021) | |
| 11/17/21 | Final Civil Docket 12-15-2021 |