Intelink Law Group

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases4

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

intelinklawgroup

intelinklaw.com

Practice Areas

DesignTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/20/23	Sattler Tech Corporation dba Wa 1:21-CV-00471 ( E.D. VA )	So Ordered: re: 100 Joint Motion for Cancellation of Patent No. D853,403 and Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice and Notice of Dismissal filed by Sattler Tech Corporation dba Wali Electronics. US Patent No. D853,403 shall be Ordered to be cancelled by the United States Patent Office; Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP that this action, and each and every count and claim asserted against Lyu therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, expenses and fees; Additionally, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the FRCP, Pltf dismisses each and every count and claim asserted therein against the remaining defts with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, expenses and fees. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 3/17/23. (pmil, ) (Main Document 101 replaced on 3/21/2023) (pmil, ). (Entered: 03/20/2023) So Ordered: re: 100 Joint Motion for Cancellation of Patent No. D853,403 and Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice and Notice of Dismissal filed by Sattler Tech Corporation dba Wali Electronics. US Patent No. D853,403 shall be Ordered to be cancelled by the United States Patent Office; Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the FRCP that this action, and each and every count and claim asserted against Lyu therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, expenses and fees; Additionally, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the FRCP, Pltf dismisses each and every count and claim asserted therein against the remaining defts with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, expenses and fees. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 3/17/23. (pmil, ) (Main Document 101 replaced on 3/21/2023) (pmil, ). (Entered: 03/20/2023)
03/17/23	Sattler Tech Corporation dba Wa 1:21-CV-00471 ( E.D. VA )	STIPULATION of Dismissal as to All Claim, including 3:23cv74 by Sattler Tech Corporation dba Wali Electronics. (Westreich, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/17/2023)
08/02/22	Drain Away LLC v. Floraflex Corp 2:22-CV-03662 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Drain Away, LLC. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Hartman, Bradley) (Entered: 08/02/2022)
05/27/22	Drain Away LLC v. Floraflex Corp 2:22-CV-03662 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 08-02-2022
08/18/21	Pollen Gear LLC v. Canndescent LLC 2:21-CV-01875 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (lom) (Entered: 08/18/2021)
08/18/21	Pollen Gear LLC v. Canndescent LLC 2:21-CV-01875 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. On August 2, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff`s response 19 filed on August 16, 2021. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. Furthermore, the Court having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 08/18/2021) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. On August 2, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff`s response 19 filed on August 16, 2021. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. Furthermore, the Court having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 08/18/2021)
08/18/21	Pollen Gear LLC v. Canndescent LLC 2:21-CV-01875 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 08-18-2021