United States Securities & Exchange Commission

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases795

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

u-s

ussteel.com

Practice Areas

BiotechMech Eng, ManufCommunications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/16/24	Martin v. United STATES 1:23-CV-02758 ( D. DC )	MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 35 Counter-Motion for Stay of Dismissal Proceedings. On May 2, 2024, Defendants Torralba Properties, LLC and Edward Bravenec moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint on various grounds, including personal jurisdiction and improper venue. ECF Nos. 20, 23. On May 30, 2024, Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment against all Defendants. ECF No. 30. However, in light of the pending motions to dismiss, the Court stayed all deadlines for all Defendants to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment. See Minute Order of June 12, 2024. As the Court explained, the "general practice is to adhere to the traditional litigation sequence of complaint; answer or motion to dismiss; discovery, if appropriate; and only then, summary judgment." Id. (quoting Comm. on Ways & Means v. Dept of Treasury, No. 19-cv-1974 (TNM), 2019 WL 4094563, at 2 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 2019)). And here, Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was premature given that the pending motions to dismiss include jurisdictional challenges. The day after the Court entered that Order, Plaintiff filed a 35 Counter-Motion to stay proceedings on the motions to dismiss pending the outcome of the partial summary judgment motion. For all the same reasons explained above, the 35 Counter-Motion to stay is improper because the Court must proceed to resolve jurisdictional challenges before considering any motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's 35 Counter-Motion for Stay of Dismissal Proceedings is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 7/16/2024. (lctjk2) (Entered: 07/16/2024) MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's 35 Counter-Motion for Stay of Dismissal Proceedings. On May 2, 2024, Defendants Torralba Properties, LLC and Edward Bravenec moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint on various grounds, including personal jurisdiction and improper venue. ECF Nos. 20, 23. On May 30, 2024, Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment against all Defendants. ECF No. 30. However, in light of the pending motions to dismiss, the Court stayed all deadlines for all Defendants to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment. See Minute Order of June 12, 2024. As the Court explained, the "general practice is to adhere to the traditional litigation sequence of complaint; answer or motion to dismiss; discovery, if appropriate; and only then, summary judgment." Id. (quoting Comm. on Ways & Means v. Dept of Treasury, No. 19-cv-1974 (TNM), 2019 WL 4094563, at 2 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 2019)). And here, Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was premature given that the pending motions to dismiss include jurisdictional challenges. The day after the Court entered that Order, Plaintiff filed a 35 Counter-Motion to stay proceedings on the motions to dismiss pending the outcome of the partial summary judgment motion. For all the same reasons explained above, the 35 Counter-Motion to stay is improper because the Court must proceed to resolve jurisdictional challenges before considering any motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's 35 Counter-Motion for Stay of Dismissal Proceedings is DENIED. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 7/16/2024. (lctjk2) (Entered: 07/16/2024)
07/11/24	Burandt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00751 ( E.D. VA )	ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before July 31, 2024 in re 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 7/11/2024. (Sbro, ) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
07/11/24	Burandt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00751 ( E.D. VA )	Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint by Katherine K. Vidal. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mezger, Matthew) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
07/01/24	Stinson v. Nejah 3:23-CV-04858 ( N.D. CA )	CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: The court is working on the pending motions and thus continues the CMC from 7/11/2024 to 10/17/2024 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/10/2024. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb ]General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Entered: 07/01/2024) CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: The court is working on the pending motions and thus continues the CMC from 7/11/2024 to 10/17/2024 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/10/2024. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb ]General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: [https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/]. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (Entered: 07/01/2024)
06/20/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00184 ( E.D. VA )	NOTICE of Appearance by Hugham Chan on behalf of Katherine K. Vidal (Chan, Hugham) (Entered: 06/20/2024)
06/21/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00184 ( E.D. VA )	ORDER granting 10 Motion to Stay. The above-captioned case is STAYED pending resolution of Hyatt v. Vidal, 1:05-cv-02310-RCL (D.D.C.), and its related cases, in the Federal Circuit. See Hyatt v. Hirshfeld, 18-2390, et al. (Fed. Cir.) (the "D.D.C. Action"). Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court once the Federal Circuit issues its final disposition of the D.D.C. Action, and the Court will thereafter schedule a status conference or otherwise address further disposition of this action. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/20/2024. (dvanm) (Entered: 06/21/2024) ORDER granting 10 Motion to Stay. The above-captioned case is STAYED pending resolution of Hyatt v. Vidal, 1:05-cv-02310-RCL (D.D.C.), and its related cases, in the Federal Circuit. See Hyatt v. Hirshfeld, 18-2390, et al. (Fed. Cir.) (the "D.D.C. Action"). Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court once the Federal Circuit issues its final disposition of the D.D.C. Action, and the Court will thereafter schedule a status conference or otherwise address further disposition of this action. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/20/2024. (dvanm) (Entered: 06/21/2024)
06/20/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00184 ( E.D. VA )	Consent MOTION to Stay the Case by Katherine K. Vidal. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Chan, Hugham) (Entered: 06/20/2024)
06/03/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00064 ( E.D. VA )	Consent MOTION to Stay the Case by Katherine K. Vidal. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order)(Chan, Hugham) (Entered: 06/03/2024)
06/03/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00064 ( E.D. VA )	NOTICE of Appearance by Hugham Chan on behalf of Katherine K. Vidal (Chan, Hugham) (Entered: 06/03/2024)
06/05/24	Hyatt v. Vidal 1:24-CV-00064 ( E.D. VA )	ORDERED that the motion is hereby GRANTED. The above-captioned case is STAYED pending resolution of Hyatt v. Vidal, 1:05-cv-023 10-RCL (D.D.C.), and its related cases, in the Federal Circuit. See Hyatt v. Hirshfeld, 18-2390, et al.(Fed. Cir.) (the "D.D.C. Action"). Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court once the Federal Circuit issues its final disposition of the D.D.C. Action, and the Court will thereafter schedule a status conference or otherwise address further disposition of this action in re [9] Consent Motion to Stay the Case. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/3/2024. (swil) (Entered: 06/05/2024) ORDERED that the motion is hereby GRANTED. The above-captioned case is STAYED pending resolution of Hyatt v. Vidal, 1:05-cv-023 10-RCL (D.D.C.), and its related cases, in the Federal Circuit. See Hyatt v. Hirshfeld, 18-2390, et al.(Fed. Cir.) (the "D.D.C. Action"). Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court once the Federal Circuit issues its final disposition of the D.D.C. Action, and the Court will thereafter schedule a status conference or otherwise address further disposition of this action in re [9] Consent Motion to Stay the Case. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/3/2024. (swil) (Entered: 06/05/2024)