Office Of Attorney General

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases148

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

federal-public

gan.fd.org

Practice Areas

Comp. Arch. and SoftwareTransport., E-Comm.Communications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	DECLARATION of T. Lester Wallace re [597] MOTION for PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT of No Inequitable Conduct of William Gerstenzang . (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A - Prosecution History, # [2] Exhibit B - Gerstenzang Obituary, # [3] Exhibit C - Chinese Patent, # [4] Exhibit D - Office Action April 11, 2014) (Hale, William) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS re [597] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Counter Defendants Buergofol GmbH, Buergofol GmbH, Plaintiff Buergofol GmbH (Hale, William) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	BRIEF by Counter Defendants Buergofol GmbH, Buergofol GmbH, Plaintiff Buergofol GmbH re [597] MOTION for PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT of No Inequitable Conduct of William Gerstenzang (Hale, William) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	MOTION for PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT of No Inequitable Conduct of William Gerstenzang by Buergofol GmbH. (Hale, William) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	RESPONSE to Motion re [585] MOTION for Protective Order on Remaining Contested Topics After Custodian Deposition filed by Omega Liner Company, Inc.. (Joyce, Meghann) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorney as to Buergofol GmbH, Buergofol GmbH, Buergofol GmbH. Attorney William Hale added. Attorney Elizabeth S. Hertz and Alayna A. Holmstrom terminated. (Hale, William) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	REPLY to [523] Motion for Order to Show Cause Against Omega's Counsel filed by Omega Liner Company, Inc.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit 18 - Buergofol's November 8, 2024, Motion to Strike Omega's Reply in IPR Proceeding for US Patent No. 9,657,882 (Paper 34)) (Joyce, Meghann) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
01/16/25	Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Co Inc 4:22-CV-04112 ( D. SD )	ORDER granting [592] Motion for Leave to file surreply.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 1/16/2025. (SLT) (Entered: 01/16/2025)
11/27/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's [47] Pro Se Motion for Permission to File Electronically in ECF : The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's [47] request for permission to electronically file documents via CM/ECF. Since Plaintiff has filed a certification as directed showing that Plaintiff is in compliance with the Court's requirements, permission is granted for Plaintiff to participate in electronic case filing in this case only. Plaintiff is authorized to conduct N.D.N.Y. CM/ECF filing via a PACER account in ONLY this case. Plaintiff must not permit anyone else to utilize their PACER account. Plaintiff must comply with all N.D.N.Y. Local Rules, all Federal Rules, all General Orders of the N.D.N.Y., and all Court Orders, directives, and practices. Plaintiff must comply with all directives issued by the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff in connection with any filing on CM/ECF as to which the Clerks Office contacts Plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that any violation of any condition or any abuse otherwise of participation in electronic case filing will result in the immediate revocation of plaintiff participating in electronic case filing. Additionally, the court may revoke these electronic filing privileges if it determines in its sole discretion that plaintiff's use of the system is not satisfactory. The clerk will contact the pro se litigant via email with further instructions to complete the registration process. SO ORDERED. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/24)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024) TEXT ORDER granting Plaintiff's [47] Pro Se Motion for Permission to File Electronically in ECF : The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's [47] request for permission to electronically file documents via CM/ECF. Since Plaintiff has filed a certification as directed showing that Plaintiff is in compliance with the Court's requirements, permission is granted for Plaintiff to participate in electronic case filing in this case only. Plaintiff is authorized to conduct N.D.N.Y. CM/ECF filing via a PACER account in ONLY this case. Plaintiff must not permit anyone else to utilize their PACER account. Plaintiff must comply with all N.D.N.Y. Local Rules, all Federal Rules, all General Orders of the N.D.N.Y., and all Court Orders, directives, and practices. Plaintiff must comply with all directives issued by the Clerk of Court to Plaintiff in connection with any filing on CM/ECF as to which the Clerks Office contacts Plaintiff. Plaintiff is advised and cautioned that any violation of any condition or any abuse otherwise of participation in electronic case filing will result in the immediate revocation of plaintiff participating in electronic case filing. Additionally, the court may revoke these electronic filing privileges if it determines in its sole discretion that plaintiff's use of the system is not satisfactory. The clerk will contact the pro se litigant via email with further instructions to complete the registration process. SO ORDERED. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/24)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024)
11/27/24	Weissbrod Gurvey v. Hochul 1:24-CV-00211 ( N.D. NY )	TEXT ORDER: On August 21, 2024, plaintiff filed a letter motion (Dkt. No. 44) seeking, among other things, a 30-day extension of time to respond in opposition to dkt. nos. 38 and 39, to seek her own counsel, and for ECF e-filing privileges. To the extent plaintiff seeks the extension of time to respond to dkt. nos 38, 39 and file her cross-motions, and seek to retain her own counsel, the extension request is DISMISSED as moot, as plaintiff has filed her opposition and cross motions at docket number 48, and, in light of special solicitude, the Court will deem it timely, and plaintiff has been afforded time to seek to retain counsel on her own. To the extent plaintiff seeks e-filing privileges, dkt. no. 44 and in dkt. no. 47, that request is GRANTED and will be memorialized in an Order to follow. The Court will address plaintiffs motion, to the extent it seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel, in a separate order. So Ordered. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/2024)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024) TEXT ORDER: On August 21, 2024, plaintiff filed a letter motion (Dkt. No. 44) seeking, among other things, a 30-day extension of time to respond in opposition to dkt. nos. 38 and 39, to seek her own counsel, and for ECF e-filing privileges. To the extent plaintiff seeks the extension of time to respond to dkt. nos 38, 39 and file her cross-motions, and seek to retain her own counsel, the extension request is DISMISSED as moot, as plaintiff has filed her opposition and cross motions at docket number 48, and, in light of special solicitude, the Court will deem it timely, and plaintiff has been afforded time to seek to retain counsel on her own. To the extent plaintiff seeks e-filing privileges, dkt. no. 44 and in dkt. no. 47, that request is GRANTED and will be memorialized in an Order to follow. The Court will address plaintiffs motion, to the extent it seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel, in a separate order. So Ordered. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 11/27/2024. (Copy served via regular mail on 11/27/2024)(tab) (Entered: 11/27/2024)