Bird Marella Boxer Wolpert Nessim Drooks Lincenberg

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases18

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

birdmarella

birdmarella.com

Practice Areas

CommunicationsComp. Arch. and SoftwareSoftware, Security

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
05/28/24	Palo Alto Research Center Inc v. Twitter Inc 2:20-CV-10754 ( C.D. CA )	STATUS REPORT Regarding Inter Partes Review Petitions filed by Plaintiff Xerox Corporation. (Sochia, David) (Entered: 05/28/2024)
07/05/22	Covco HK Ltd v. SAS Safety Corp 8:21-CV-01693 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (es) (Entered: 07/05/2022)
07/05/22	Covco HK Ltd v. SAS Safety Corp 8:21-CV-01693 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge James V. Selna: Case should have been closed re: Stipulation to Dismiss Case 55 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) (Entered: 07/05/2022)
10/12/21	Covco HK Ltd v. SAS Safety Corp 8:21-CV-01693 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 07-05-2022
09/03/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: PLEASE DISREGARD PREVIOUS ENTRY CONTINUING THE MOTION TO DISMISS 39 . Hearing remains on calendar for September 5, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 09/03/2019)
02/28/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) (Entered: 02/28/2019)
02/28/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) (Entered: 02/28/2019)
10/31/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, 36 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against BlackBerry Limited filed by Defendant Twitter, Inc..(Kang, Grace) (Entered: 10/31/2019)
10/22/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING DEADLINES FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend, Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), 52 . 1. The deadline for BlackBerry Limited to file a Second Amended Complaint, if it chooses to do so, shall be extended to October 24, 2019; 2. Should BlackBerry not file a Second Amended Complaint by October 24, 2019, Twitter, Inc.s Answer to the First Amended Complaint will be due on November 8, 2019. (mrgo) (Entered: 10/22/2019) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING DEADLINES FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend, Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), 52 . 1. The deadline for BlackBerry Limited to file a Second Amended Complaint, if it chooses to do so, shall be extended to October 24, 2019; 2. Should BlackBerry not file a Second Amended Complaint by October 24, 2019, Twitter, Inc.s Answer to the First Amended Complaint will be due on November 8, 2019. (mrgo) (Entered: 10/22/2019)
10/15/19	Blackberry Ltd v. Twitter Inc 2:19-CV-01444 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Amended Complaint/Petition, 36 , Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Amended Complaint/Petition, 36 filed by Plaintiff BlackBerry Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Asperger, James) (Entered: 10/15/2019)