David R Flyer Law Offices

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.
Cases12
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, ManufTransport., E-Comm.Semicond., Optic
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L5
A
PTAB
L5
A
CAFC
L5
A

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
11/06/23
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv)(jms). (Entered: 11/06/2023)
11/06/23
REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *9,148,938* cc:USPTO (ggv) (jms). (Entered: 11/06/2023)
11/06/23
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fives Investments, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Samir H. Safar for Fives Investments, LLC. (ggv) (jms). (Entered: 11/06/2023)
11/06/23
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 to 10, Nanoleaf Canada Limited ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18327418.), filed by Fives Investments, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - 938 Patent)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2045-BEN-KSC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Flyer, David)(ggv) (jms). (Entered: 11/06/2023)
02/22/19
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Honorable Roger T. Benitez: At the close of the evidence, Plaintiffs orally moved for judgment as a matter of law and argued that Defendants did not carry their burden to establish ownership, secondary meaning, and non-functionality in support of their trade dress claim. The Court has considered the motion and finds that a reasonable jury would have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for Defendants on those issues. The motion is DENIED. (no document attached) (gxr) (Entered: 02/22/2019)
08/15/18
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by DePalma Enterprises, Inc., H.I.S.C, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Gabriel G. Hedrick, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit G, # 4 Exhibit H, # 5 Exhibit I, # 6 Exhibit K, # 7 Exhibit L, # 8 Exhibit M, # 9 Exhibit N, # 10 Exhibit O, # 11 Exhibit P, # 12 Exhibit Q, # 13 Request for Judicial Notice)(Hedrick, Gabriel) (anh). (Entered: 08/15/2018)
10/26/18
In Limine MOTION to Preclude Argument, Evidence or Testimony Regarding Whisks and Colorized Brooms by DePalma Enterprises, Inc., H.I.S.C, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Gabriel G. Hedrick, # 2 Exhibit A (Transcript of Maria Rajanayagam Depo), # 3 Exhibit B (Transcript of Franmar Depo), # 4 Exhibit C (Englis Expert Report))(Hedrick, Gabriel) (anh). (Entered: 10/26/2018)
10/26/18
In Limine MOTION to Preclude Argument, Evidence or Testimony Regarding Defendants Extraterritorial Sales, Advertising and Marketing by DePalma Enterprises, Inc., H.I.S.C, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Gabriel G. Hedrick)(Hedrick, Gabriel) (anh). (Entered: 10/26/2018)
10/26/18
In Limine MOTION to Preclude Argument, Evidence or Testimony Regarding Copying In Support of Secondary Meaning by DePalma Enterprises, Inc., H.I.S.C, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Gabriel G. Hedrick, # 2 Exhibit A (Defendants Rebuttal Expert Disclosures))(Hedrick, Gabriel) (anh). (Entered: 10/26/2018)
10/26/18
In Limine MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony of Maria Rajanayagam Not Disclosed in Defendants Expert Witness Disclosures by DePalma Enterprises, Inc., H.I.S.C, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Gabriel G. Hedrick, # 2 Exhibit A (Defendants Expert Disclosures), # 3 Exhibit B (Defendants Rebuttal Expert Disclosures))(Hedrick, Gabriel) (anh). (Entered: 10/26/2018)