Dolgin Law Group

Illinois

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases7

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/08/23	Think Products Inc v. ACCO Brands 1:22-CV-03183 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED Patent closing report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Attachments: # 1 Closing Minute Entry dated 8/3/2023) (jh, ) (Entered: 08/08/2023)
08/02/23	Think Products Inc v. ACCO Brands 1:21-CV-03071 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal 46, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) (Entered: 08/02/2023)
08/02/23	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:22-CV-05313 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal 38, the terms of which are set forth therein. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 08/02/2023)
08/02/23	Think Products Inc v. ACCO Bran 1:19-CV-06978 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal 164, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. Plaintiff's combined motion to strike or to dismiss defendants' second counterclaim, and to strike allegations Nos. 8-26 and 28-66 of defendants' answer 84 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) (Entered: 08/02/2023) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal 164, this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. Plaintiff's combined motion to strike or to dismiss defendants' second counterclaim, and to strike allegations Nos. 8-26 and 28-66 of defendants' answer 84 is denied as moot. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) (Entered: 08/02/2023)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE by THINK PRODUCTS, INC. Plaintiff Think Products, Inc.`s Local Rule 3.4 Notice of Claims Involving Patents (Dolgin, Jay) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	CIVIL Cover Sheet (Dolgin, Jay) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed by THINK PRODUCTS, INC.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-18985302. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-3)(Dolgin, Jay) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey I. Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (dxb, ) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	CLERK`S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, ) (Entered: 12/20/2021) CLERK`S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (dxb, ) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/20/21	Think Products Inc v. Microsoft Corp 1:21-CV-06757 ( N.D. IL )	Initial Civil Docket 12-20-2021