Gabriel & Pelaez PLLC
General
Cases1
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, Manuf
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
09/30/24 | CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's expert testimony is denied; that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of infringement with respect to Claim 12 of the 648 Patent; Claims 1 and 24 of the 252 Patent; and Claims 1 and 13 of the 218 Patent is granted; that Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' reply brief and reply Local Rule 56.1 statement in support of their motion for summary judgment of noninfringement is denied as moot; that Defendants' motion for summary judgment of noninfringement is denied as moot; and that Plaintiff's remaining claims of infringement are dismissed as voluntarily abandoned. Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 9/30/2024. (JP) (Entered: 09/30/2024) | |
09/30/24 | ORDER: For the reasons explained in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court denies Defendants' request to strike Plaintiff's expert testimony; grants [82] Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of infringement with respect to Claim 12 of the '648 Patent; Claims 1 and 24 of the '252 Patent; and Claims 1 and 13 of the '218 Patent; denies as moot [86] Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendants' reply brief and reply Local Rule 56.1 statement; and denies as moot [80] Defendants' motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. The Court dismisses Plaintiff's remaining claims of infringement as voluntarily abandoned. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 9/30/2024. (AH) (Entered: 09/30/2024) |