Gibby Law Firm PLLC

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases11

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

gibby

gibby.id

Practice Areas

Transport., E-Comm.DesignChemical

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
10/25/22	Horowitz v. WalMart Inc 5:22-CV-05083 ( W.D. AR )	CLERK'S ORDER Dismissing Case re 21 Stipulation filed by WalMart, Inc. (CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE). (tg) (Entered: 10/25/2022)
10/25/22	Horowitz v. WalMart Inc 5:22-CV-05083 ( W.D. AR )	STIPULATION JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by WalMart, Inc.. (Freeman, Karen) (Entered: 10/25/2022)
09/20/22	Brian Horowitz v. Intl E Z Up Inc 8:22-CV-00951 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order Granting Joint Stipulation of Dismissal) (gk) (Entered: 09/20/2022)
09/20/22	Brian Horowitz v. Intl E Z Up Inc 8:22-CV-00951 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) AND 41(c) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), dismissing the Complaint with prejudice and the Counterclaims without prejudice 19 is approved. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 09/20/2022) ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) AND 41(c) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), dismissing the Complaint with prejudice and the Counterclaims without prejudice 19 is approved. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 09/20/2022)
	Brian Horowitz v. Sekey Group 8:21-CV-00771 ( C.D. CA )	ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), Counterclaim [40] Answer to Defendant Sekey Group's Counterclaim with Proof of Service filed by Plaintiff & Counter Defendant Brian Horowitz.(Forsythe, Marc)
	Brian Horowitz v. Yishun Chen 8:17-CV-00432 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING CROSS-DEFENDANTS YUE ZHANG AND CALIBER LEGAL, P.C.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE CROSSCLAIMS [230], DEFENDANTS / COUNTER-COMPLAINANTS YISHUN CHEN AND ZHAOSHENG CHEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THE VARIOUS CLAIMS ASSERTED IN THIS ACTION BY PLAINTIFFS [260], DEFENDANTS KEVIN XIA AND EVERYDAYSPORTS OUTDOOR CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS [267] AND PLAINTIFFS BRIAN HOROWITZ AND CREATIVE OUTDOOR DISTRIBUTORS USA, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [272] UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds that the referenced motions currently scheduled for hearing on February 11, 2022, are appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, these motions are taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The court expects the parties to continue litigating this action diligently, while awaiting the court's ruling on this motion. No appearances are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY TEXT ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING CROSS-DEFENDANTS YUE ZHANG AND CALIBER LEGAL, P.C.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE CROSSCLAIMS [230], DEFENDANTS / COUNTER-COMPLAINANTS YISHUN CHEN AND ZHAOSHENG CHEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THE VARIOUS CLAIMS ASSERTED IN THIS ACTION BY PLAINTIFFS [260], DEFENDANTS KEVIN XIA AND EVERYDAYSPORTS OUTDOOR CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS [267] AND PLAINTIFFS BRIAN HOROWITZ AND CREATIVE OUTDOOR DISTRIBUTORS USA, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [272] UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court finds that the referenced motions currently scheduled for hearing on February 11, 2022, are appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, these motions are taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. The court expects the parties to continue litigating this action diligently, while awaiting the court's ruling on this motion. No appearances are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
05/26/21	Brian Horowitz v. Toolots Inc 8:21-CV-00021 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 attachment) (twdb) (Entered: 05/26/2021)
05/26/21	Brian Horowitz v. Toolots Inc 8:21-CV-00021 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE. re: Notice of Settlement 24 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) (Entered: 05/26/2021)
02/17/21	Brian Horowitz v. Becko Bros Inc 8:20-CV-01795 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 02/17/2021)
02/17/21	Brian Horowitz v. Becko Bros Inc 8:20-CV-01795 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 28 : Having considered the Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice [Docket No. 28] ("Stipulation"), the court hereby finds and orders as follows: This matter is dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 02/17/2021)