Manning Curtis Bradshaw & Bednar PLLC
General
Cases5
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Semicond., OpticSoftware, SecurityTransport., E-Comm.
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
05/17/24 | DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024) |