Manning Curtis Bradshaw & Bednar PLLC

Utah

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

Cases5

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticSoftware, SecurityTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Entered	Case	Description
05/17/24	Eagle View Technologies v. Nearmap 2:21-CV-00283 ( D. UT )	DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024) DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying 415 Nearmap's Motion for Sanctions. Nearmap requests an award of fees and expenses incurred in responding to: (1) EagleView's motion to compel 379, and (2) EagleView's objections 406 to the order denying that motion. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court declines to award expenses to Nearmap because EagleView's position in the motion to compel and objection was substantially justified. Therefore, Nearmap's motion for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 5/17/2024. No attached document. (med) (Entered: 05/17/2024)