Loza Loza LLP

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases31

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

loza-loza

lozaip.com

Practice Areas

Comp. Arch. and SoftwareDesignTransport., E-Comm.

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/03/24	MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc. 2:22-CV-07464 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE SORTING ROBOTICS, INC.'S APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. 145 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Based on a review of the Sorting Robotics, Inc.'s Application to File Documents Under Seal, sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the relief requested through the Application is GRANTED, as follows: The identified materials shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 07/03/2024) ORDER RE SORTING ROBOTICS, INC.'S APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. 145 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Based on a review of the Sorting Robotics, Inc.'s Application to File Documents Under Seal, sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the relief requested through the Application is GRANTED, as follows: The identified materials shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 07/03/2024)
07/03/24	MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc. 2:22-CV-07464 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE MPI'S APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. 150 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Based on a review of the MPI's Application to File Documents Under Seal (the "Application" (Dkt. 150)), sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the relief requested through the Application is GRANTED, as follows: The identified materials shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 07/03/2024) ORDER RE MPI'S APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. 150 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Based on a review of the MPI's Application to File Documents Under Seal (the "Application" (Dkt. 150)), sufficient good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the relief requested through the Application is GRANTED, as follows: The identified materials shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 07/03/2024)
07/02/24	MPI LLC v. Sorting Robotics, Inc. 2:22-CV-07464 ( C.D. CA )	PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff MPI LLC, re Sealed Declaration in SupportDeclaration, 151 through [151-3] served on July 1, 2024. (De Preter, Matthew) (Entered: 07/02/2024)
07/12/23	Nicor Inc v. Sourceblue LLC 2:21-CV-05876 ( C.D. CA )	Joint Claim Construction BRIEF filed by Plaintiff/Counterdefendant NICOR Inc, NICOR Inc, NICOR, Inc.. regarding Order,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines, 179 . (Bacani, Lena) (Entered: 07/12/2023)
12/19/22	Infinilux Corp v. Nicor Inc 2:21-CV-05300 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) Procedures Re: Discovery Disputes by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: The Courts mandatory procedures regarding discovery disputes are as follows: Brief Pre-Discovery Motion Conference. In the Courts experience, discovery disputes often may be resolved without the need for formal motion papers. To facilitate the just and expedient resolution of discovery matters and to conserve the Courts and the parties resources, the Court requires the parties to follow the procedure below for filing discovery motions. This procedure does not apply to ex parte applications (see Procedure 2) or where a party to the discovery dispute is in custody. See document for further details. (et) (Entered: 12/19/2022) MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) Procedures Re: Discovery Disputes by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue: The Courts mandatory procedures regarding discovery disputes are as follows: Brief Pre-Discovery Motion Conference. In the Courts experience, discovery disputes often may be resolved without the need for formal motion papers. To facilitate the just and expedient resolution of discovery matters and to conserve the Courts and the parties resources, the Court requires the parties to follow the procedure below for filing discovery motions. This procedure does not apply to ex parte applications (see Procedure 2) or where a party to the discovery dispute is in custody. See document for further details. (et) (Entered: 12/19/2022)
07/18/22	Unirac Inc v. Esdec Inc 1:21-CV-00616 ( D. NM )	Report re: patent (dr) (Entered: 07/18/2022)
07/02/21	Unirac Inc v. Esdec Inc 1:21-CV-00616 ( D. NM )	Final Civil Docket 07-18-2022
	California Costume Collections Inc v. Pandaloon LLC 2:21-CV-01323 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Duplicative entry [35] - identical Memorandum Opinion and Order to document number [34] . (pj)
	Es Distribution LLC v. Hangtime LLC 1:20-CV-01221 ( D. NM )	Report re: patent (jg)
07/21/21	Nicor Inc v. Sourceblue LLC 1:21-CV-00698 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,824,427. (Attachments: # 1 Order transferring case)(nms) (Entered: 07/21/2021)