Zumpano Patricios & Popok
General
Cases2
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
BiotechMech Eng, Manuf
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
---|---|---|
09/30/24 | CLERK'S JUDGMENT: that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; that Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed; that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signed by Deputy Clerk, Jalitza Poveda, on behalf of Clerk of Court, Brenna B. Mahoney, on 9/30/2024. (copy of appeals packet and judgment mailed to pro se). (JP) (Entered: 09/30/2024) | |
09/30/24 | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum and order, Defendants' motion to dismiss [54] for failure to state a claim is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se plaintiff, enter judgment, and close this case. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 9/30/2024. (CG) (Entered: 09/30/2024) | |
09/30/24 | ORDER: Defendants' request [60] for a pre-motion conference is DENIED. The parties shall brief any motion for sanctions in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices. Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with any motion on or before October 14, 2024. Plaintiff shall serve Defendants with his opposition on or before October 28, 2024. Defendants shall serve Plaintiff with any reply on or before November 4, 2024. As a courtesy, unless the parties object, the Court asks that Defendants file the motion once fully briefed. The motion for sanctions is respectfully REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom. Defendants are directed to serve the pro se Plaintiff with a copy of this Order. Ordered by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall on 9/30/2024. (CG) (Entered: 09/30/2024) |