Theodora Oringher Miller & Richman

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases32

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

theodora-oringher

tocounsel.com

Practice Areas

Comp. Arch. and SoftwareCommunicationsDesign

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
05/26/23	L KS Upl Na Inc v. Tide Intl USA Inc 8:19-CV-01201 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff UPL NA, Inc. and Defendants Tide International (USA), Inc., Zhejiang Tide CropScience Co., Ltd., and Ningbo Tide Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of this action in its entirety and with respect to any claim that was or could have been asserted against Defendants concerning U.S. Patent No. 7,473,685, in view of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals April 14, 2023 Opinion affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Boards January 4, 2022 Final Written Decision invalidating claims 1-4 of the 685 patent. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) (Entered: 05/26/2023) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff UPL NA, Inc. and Defendants Tide International (USA), Inc., Zhejiang Tide CropScience Co., Ltd., and Ningbo Tide Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of this action in its entirety and with respect to any claim that was or could have been asserted against Defendants concerning U.S. Patent No. 7,473,685, in view of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals April 14, 2023 Opinion affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Boards January 4, 2022 Final Written Decision invalidating claims 1-4 of the 685 patent. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO STIPULATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) (Entered: 05/26/2023)
05/25/23	L KS Upl Na Inc v. Tide Intl USA Inc 8:19-CV-01201 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff UPL NA, Inc..(Smyth, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/25/2023)
05/25/23	L KS Upl Na Inc v. Tide Intl USA Inc 8:19-CV-01201 ( C.D. CA )	STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) (Entered: 05/25/2023)
	Modern Telecom Systems LLC v. D Link Systems Inc 8:18-CV-01982 ( C.D. CA )	REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing). (Attachments: # [1] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) (jp)