Protzman Law Firm

Missouri

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases5

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Semicond., OpticChemicalComp. Arch. and Software

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/08/23	Lexos Media IP LLC v. Overstockcom Inc 2:22-CV-02324 ( D. KS )	RESPONSE to 73 Claim, Construction Brief by Overstock by Counter Defendant Lexos Media IP, LLC, Plaintiff Lexos Media IP, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 -RL 102 IPR Petition, # 2 Exhibit 2 - RL 449 IPR Petition, # 3 Exhibit 3 - RL Fed.Cir. Appeal Decision, # 4 Exhibit 4 - 2023 07 17 Petition Decision, # 5 Exhibit 5 - BIB data sheet, # 6 Exhibit 6 -2023 01 24 Lexos Media's Infringement Contentions [Lexos v. Overstock])(Cooper, David) (Entered: 08/08/2023) RESPONSE to 73 Claim, Construction Brief by Overstock by Counter Defendant Lexos Media IP, LLC, Plaintiff Lexos Media IP, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 -RL 102 IPR Petition, # 2 Exhibit 2 - RL 449 IPR Petition, # 3 Exhibit 3 - RL Fed.Cir. Appeal Decision, # 4 Exhibit 4 - 2023 07 17 Petition Decision, # 5 Exhibit 5 - BIB data sheet, # 6 Exhibit 6 -2023 01 24 Lexos Media's Infringement Contentions [Lexos v. Overstock])(Cooper, David) (Entered: 08/08/2023)
10/27/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 3:22-CV-00280 ( N.D. TX )	The following patents were Instituted by PTAB: Patent US8975605 in IPR2022-00682
02/04/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 4:21-CV-00345 ( W.D. MO )	ORDER granting 41 motion to transfer case to Northern District of Texas. Signed on 2/4/22 by District Judge Gary A. Fenner. (Mitchell, Lisa) (Entered: 02/04/2022)
02/04/22	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 4:21-CV-00345 ( W.D. MO )	Case electronically transferred to District of Northern District of Texas. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Crocker, Susan) (Entered: 02/04/2022)
07/15/21	S Edward Neister v. Far Uv Technologies 4:21-CV-00345 ( W.D. MO )	Final Civil Docket 02-04-2022
11/30/21	Display Tech LLC v. Greater Goods LLC 4:21-CV-00988 ( E.D. MO )	FINAL REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding patent (TMT) (Entered: 11/30/2021)
11/30/21	Display Tech LLC v. Greater Goods LLC 4:21-CV-00988 ( E.D. MO )	Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, Doc. 12, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice against Plaintiff and without prejudice against Defendant, each party to bear his, her, or its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/30/2021. (TMT) (Entered: 11/30/2021) Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, Doc. 12, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice against Plaintiff and without prejudice against Defendant, each party to bear his, her, or its own attorneys' fees and costs. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/30/2021. (TMT) (Entered: 11/30/2021)
11/30/21	Display Tech LLC v. Greater Goods LLC 4:21-CV-00988 ( E.D. MO )	Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Rule 16 Order 14 is VACATED. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 11/30/2021. (TMT) (Entered: 11/30/2021)
08/09/21	Display Tech LLC v. Greater Goods LLC 4:21-CV-00988 ( E.D. MO )	Final Civil Docket 11-30-2021