Autz IP
General
Cases5
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, ManufReexam/Aband.
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/18/22 | ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE: The Court having been advised, see Dkt. 40, by the parties that plaintiff and defendant Transform SR Brands LLC have reached an agreement in this matter, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Transform SR Brands LLC if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 30 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 30-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate defendant Transform SR Brands LLC as a party. SO ORDERED. Transform SR Brands LLC terminated. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/17/2022) (va) (Entered: 10/18/2022) | |
| 10/18/22 | ORDER: granting 41 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/17/2022) (ama) (Entered: 10/18/2022) | |
| 10/18/22 | ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on October 14, 2022. Being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 3. This case is CLOSED. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2022. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/18/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 10/18/2022) | |
| 08/24/22 | AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/24/2022 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(nd) (Entered: 08/24/2022) | |
| 04/22/22 | Final Civil Docket 08-24-2022 | |
| 07/27/22 | Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Central District of California acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:22-cv-05085, filed on 07/22/2022. (vba) (Entered: 07/27/2022) | |
| 04/21/22 | AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/21/2022) | |
| 04/21/22 | REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sycamore Partners LLC, re: 1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/21/2022) | |
| 04/21/22 | REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Belk Ecommerce, LLC, re: 1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/21/2022) | |
| 04/21/22 | REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Belk, Inc., re: 1 Complaint. Document filed by Durgamritha Sundaram..(Autz, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/21/2022) |