Nagashima Lee

California

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

Cases1

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, Manuf

Top Attorneys

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Entered	Case	Description
06/23/23	Virtual Immersion Tech LLC v. Safran SA 8:22-CV-01248 ( C.D. CA )	JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Safran S.A. and Safran USA, Inc. and against Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies, LLC with respect to infringement of claim 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,409,599. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants with respect to the invalidity of claim 9 of the '599 Patent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs case against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice, i.e., without leave to amend, as to claim 9 of the '599 Patent. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 06/23/2023) JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Safran S.A. and Safran USA, Inc. and against Plaintiff Virtual Immersion Technologies, LLC with respect to infringement of claim 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,409,599. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendants with respect to the invalidity of claim 9 of the '599 Patent. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs case against Defendants is dismissed with prejudice, i.e., without leave to amend, as to claim 9 of the '599 Patent. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 06/23/2023)