Snell & Wilmer LLP
General
Cases440
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, ManufSemicond., OpticTransport., E-Comm.
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 12/23/24 | REDACTED VERSION of [529] Letter by Carlisle Companies, Inc., Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Sowada Deposition Designations, # [2] CTX_0044, # [3] CTX_0046)(Raucci, Anthony) (Entered: 12/23/2024) | |
| 12/23/24 | REDACTED VERSION of [527] Letter, by Carlisle Companies, Inc., Carlisle Construction Materials, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Dale Johnson Transcript, # [2] Jonathan Fredkove Transcript, # [3] Anthony Gargano Transcript, # [4] CTX_0024, # [5] CTX_0036)(Raucci, Anthony) (Entered: 12/23/2024) | |
| 12/23/24 | REDACTED VERSION of [519] Letter (JOINT) regarding Deposition Designations by Graco Inc., Graco Minnesota Inc.. (Keith, Colin) (Entered: 12/23/2024) | |
| 12/18/24 | ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to [439] Notice of Appeal, filed by Applications in Internet Time, LLC. Salesforce, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The mandate of the court will issue December 24, 2024. USCA Case Number 24-1685. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 12/18/2024) | |
| 12/18/24 | ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to [439] Notice of Appeal, filed by Applications in Internet Time, LLC. Salesforce, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The petition for panel rehearing is denied. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The mandate of the court will issue December 24, 2024. USCA Case Number 24-1685. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH) (Entered: 12/18/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Stewart, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Stewart, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Stewart, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Plaintiff Cricut Inc. (Stewart, Jeremy) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: # [1] Supplement) (kec) (Entered: 10/04/2024) |