Solomon N Klein

New York

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases2

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Design

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/10/25	Roll & Hill v. HPG Intl Inc 1:24-CV-07492 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by January 27, 2025. In accordance with Rule 1.D of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filing. Plaintiff will not be given any further opportunity to amend the Complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff amends, then the Court will deny the previously filed motion to dismiss as moot. By three weeks after the amended complaint is filed, Defendant shall file an answer or a new motion to dismiss. If Defendant files a new motion to dismiss, any opposition shall be filed within 14 days, and any reply shall be filed within seven days of any opposition. If no amended complaint is filed, then Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss by January 27, 2025. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed by February 3, 2025. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 1/27/2025., Replies due by 2/3/2025., Responses due by 1/27/2025) (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 1/9/2025) (jca) (Entered: 01/10/2025) ORDER Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint by January 27, 2025. In accordance with Rule 1.D of the Courts Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, any amended complaint should be filed with a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filing. Plaintiff will not be given any further opportunity to amend the Complaint to address issues raised by the motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff amends, then the Court will deny the previously filed motion to dismiss as moot. By three weeks after the amended complaint is filed, Defendant shall file an answer or a new motion to dismiss. If Defendant files a new motion to dismiss, any opposition shall be filed within 14 days, and any reply shall be filed within seven days of any opposition. If no amended complaint is filed, then Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss by January 27, 2025. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed by February 3, 2025. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 1/27/2025., Replies due by 2/3/2025., Responses due by 1/27/2025) (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 1/9/2025) (jca) (Entered: 01/10/2025)
01/10/25	Roll & Hill v. HPG Intl Inc 1:24-CV-07492 ( S.D. NY )	NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT MICHAELIS BOYD, INC Plaintiff Roll & Hill, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Michaelis Boyd, Inc. in the above-styled cause. The Clerk of Court is directed not to close this case. SO ORDERED. Michaelis Boyd, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 1/9/2025) (jca) (Entered: 01/10/2025) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT MICHAELIS BOYD, INC Plaintiff Roll & Hill, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Michaelis Boyd, Inc. in the above-styled cause. The Clerk of Court is directed not to close this case. SO ORDERED. Michaelis Boyd, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 1/9/2025) (jca) (Entered: 01/10/2025)
09/18/24	RBW Studio LLC v. Stonehill & Taylor Architects 1:24-CV-03188 ( S.D. NY )	JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Stephen F. Roth dated September 18, 2024. Document filed by PTY Lighting, Inc...(Roth, Stephen) (Entered: 09/18/2024)
09/18/24	RBW Studio LLC v. Stonehill & Taylor Architects 1:24-CV-03188 ( S.D. NY )	NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CROSS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), Defendant-Crossclaim Plaintiff Michaelis Boyd, Inc. hereby gives notice that its crossclaims are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. The Crossclaim defendants have not served an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1 )(B), Defendant-Crossclaim Plaintiff Michaelis Boyd, Inc.'s voluntary dismissal of its crossclaims is without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Michaelis Boyd, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/18/2024) (jca) (Entered: 09/18/2024) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CROSS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), Defendant-Crossclaim Plaintiff Michaelis Boyd, Inc. hereby gives notice that its crossclaims are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. The Crossclaim defendants have not served an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1 )(B), Defendant-Crossclaim Plaintiff Michaelis Boyd, Inc.'s voluntary dismissal of its crossclaims is without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Michaelis Boyd, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/18/2024) (jca) (Entered: 09/18/2024)