Bishop Diehl & Lee LTD
General
Cases106
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Mech Eng, ManufDesignTransport., E-Comm.
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 09/17/24 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [122] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [121] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [120] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim By Certain Defendants [118] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC(Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Unicucp US (Schiller, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Woputne-US (Schiller, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Okshopping (Schiller, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the unopposed motion, Defendant Jianjin's first motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to complaint [189] is granted. Defendant Jianjin's responsive pleading due 09/30/2024. Mailed notice. (jcm) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/17/24 | RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 9/17/2024. Mailed notice (ber, ) (Entered: 09/17/2024) | |
| 09/11/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal [4] is granted. The plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery [17] is denied without prejudice in part and granted in part for the reasons stated on the record. The Court grants the motion for expedited discovery but denies the motion for a temporary restraining order and for a temporary asset restraint. The plaintiff's motion for alternate service [19] is entered and continued. The plaintiff shall submit a proposed order concerning expedited discovery on or before September 13, 2024. Mailed notice. (vcf, ) (Entered: 09/11/2024) |