Todd Flaming

Illinois

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases3

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufBiotechChemical

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
08/16/24	Evolve Biosystems Inc v. Abbott Laboratories 1:19-CV-05859 ( N.D. IL )	REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated in the corresponding Report and Recommendation, and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1), the undersigned respectfully recommends that the District Judge deny defendant's motion to strike 353, as well as defendant's alternative requests to amend its final invalidity contentions or reopen expert discovery. The parties are advised that any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days after service of a copy of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file a timely objection will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Ctrs., Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009); Lorentzen v. Anderson Pest Control, 64 F.3d 327, 330 (7th Cir. 1995); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). Signed by the Honorable Heather K. McShain on 8/16/2024. Mailed notice. (pk, ) (Entered: 08/16/2024) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated in the corresponding Report and Recommendation, and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1), the undersigned respectfully recommends that the District Judge deny defendant's motion to strike 353, as well as defendant's alternative requests to amend its final invalidity contentions or reopen expert discovery. The parties are advised that any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days after service of a copy of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. Â§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file a timely objection will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. See Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Ctrs., Inc., 577 F.3d 752, 760 (7th Cir. 2009); Lorentzen v. Anderson Pest Control, 64 F.3d 327, 330 (7th Cir. 1995); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). Signed by the Honorable Heather K. McShain on 8/16/2024. Mailed notice. (pk, ) (Entered: 08/16/2024)
02/09/24	Medline Industries Inc v. CR Bard Inc 1:17-CV-07216 ( N.D. IL )	NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Medline Industries, Inc. (Reynolds, Terra) (Entered: 02/09/2024)