Wang Leonard & Condon
General
Cases2
Challenger50%
Patent Owner50%
NPE50%
--
--
Practice Areas
Semicond., Optic
Top Attorneys
Elite Ratings
DCTPTABCAFC
Analytics
Lawyers
Cases
Ratings Trends
Practice Areas
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 01/16/20 | MOTION by Plaintiff E-Link Technology Co. Ltd. for preliminary injunction (Attachments: # 1 Supplement, # 2 Exhibit)(Leonard, William) (Entered: 01/16/2020) | |
| 01/08/20 | TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 1/8/2020. Mailed notice. (ym, ) (Entered: 01/08/2020) | |
| 01/08/20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 1/7/2020. Attorney Haoyi Chens motion for leave to appear pro hac vice 6 is granted. Plaintiffs motion for temporary restraining order 4 is granted. Status hearing is set for 1/17/2020 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, ) (Entered: 01/08/2020) | |
| 01/02/20 | MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16575689. Haoyi Chen (Chen, Haoyi) (Entered: 01/02/2020) | |
| 12/30/19 | NOTICE of Motion by William J. Leonard for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 4 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 1/7/2020 at 08:45 AM. (Leonard, William) (Entered: 12/30/2019) | |
| 02/19/21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On February 19, 2021, the parties filed a jointly-signed "Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice" 42 explaining that they jointly stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the parties stipulation and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). The Court notes that, because the notice of dismissal was filed before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case could also properly be dismissed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Either way, the dismissal is effective. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ef, ) (Entered: 02/19/2021) | |
| 02/19/21 | STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE (Freire, Diego) (Entered: 02/19/2021) | |
| 08/05/20 | REPLY by Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co. Ltd. to response to motion 40 Supporting Motion to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice (McKinley, Danielle) (Entered: 08/05/2020) | |
| 07/21/20 | RESPONSE by E-Link Technology Co. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendants Shenzhen Chitado Technology Co. Ltd., Magic Hover to dismiss 36 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Pingzhi Li Declaration)(Freire, Diego) (Entered: 07/21/2020) | |
| 12/30/19 | MOTION by Plaintiff E-Link Technology Co. Ltd. for temporary restraining order (Attachments: # 1 Supplement, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Declaration, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Declaration)(Leonard, William) (Entered: 12/30/2019) |