Jdtechlaw

General

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Cases10

Challenger50%

Patent Owner50%

NPE50%

Practice Areas

Mech Eng, ManufReexam/Aband.Communications

Top Attorneys

Patrick J. CoyneNeal S. CohenPeter Kinsella

Elite Ratings

DCTPTABCAFC

Ratings

Please sign up or log in to access the advanced features of
Ex Parte Professional.

or Log in

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

PTAB

CAFC

Analytics

Lawyers

Cases

Ratings Trends

Practice Areas

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/21/23	Group One Ltd v. Gte GmbH 1:20-CV-02205 ( E.D. NY )	NOTICE OF DOCKETING re 144 Notice of Appeal- NOTICE OF DOCKETING from the Federal Circuit. 12/20/2023. #24-1273. (VJ) (Entered: 12/21/2023)
12/15/22	Conformis Inc v. Zimmer Biomet 1:19-CV-01528 ( D. DE )	Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,377,129; 8,460,304; 9,186,161; 9,295,482. (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Order)(nms) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
12/15/22	Conformis Inc v. Zimmer Biomet 1:19-CV-01528 ( D. DE )	SO ORDERED Granting 275 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/15/2022. (nms) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
11/08/22	Durgamritha T Sundaram v. Eva Varro Inc 2:22-CV-05085 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FEDERAL RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Durgamritha T. Sundaram.(Hansen, Scott) (Entered: 11/08/2022)
10/18/22	Sundaram v. Macys Inc 1:22-CV-03275 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE: The Court having been advised, see Dkt. 40, by the parties that plaintiff and defendant Transform SR Brands LLC have reached an agreement in this matter, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Transform SR Brands LLC if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 30 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 30-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate defendant Transform SR Brands LLC as a party. SO ORDERED. Transform SR Brands LLC terminated. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/17/2022) (va) (Entered: 10/18/2022) ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE: The Court having been advised, see Dkt. 40, by the parties that plaintiff and defendant Transform SR Brands LLC have reached an agreement in this matter, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to reopen the action within 30 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Transform SR Brands LLC if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 30 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 30-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate defendant Transform SR Brands LLC as a party. SO ORDERED. Transform SR Brands LLC terminated. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/17/2022) (va) (Entered: 10/18/2022)
10/18/22	Sundaram v. Macys Inc 1:22-CV-03275 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER: granting 41 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/17/2022) (ama) (Entered: 10/18/2022)
10/18/22	Sundaram v. Monroe Main Inc 1:22-CV-03278 ( S.D. NY )	ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on October 14, 2022. Being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 3. This case is CLOSED. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2022. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/18/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 10/18/2022) ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: THIS CAUSE came before the Court on a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed on October 14, 2022. Being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 3. This case is CLOSED. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2022. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/18/2022) (vfr) (Entered: 10/18/2022)
08/24/22	Durgamritha T Sundaram v. Nordstrom Inc 1:22-CV-03280 ( S.D. NY )	AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/24/2022 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(nd) (Entered: 08/24/2022) AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 8/24/2022 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(nd) (Entered: 08/24/2022)
04/22/22	Durgamritha T Sundaram v. Nordstrom Inc 1:22-CV-03280 ( S.D. NY )	Final Civil Docket 08-24-2022
07/27/22	Durgamritha T Sundaram v. Eva Varro Inc 1:22-CV-03264 ( S.D. NY )	Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Central District of California acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:22-cv-05085, filed on 07/22/2022. (vba) (Entered: 07/27/2022)