38 (shenzhenshimeihuidawangluokejiyouxiangongsi)

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
02/15/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	CONSENT JUDGMENT Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 2/15/2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 02/15/2023)
02/07/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MAILED patent report along with certified copy of order dated 2/6/2023 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (jg, ) (Entered: 02/07/2023)
02/06/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: With great reluctance, the Court grants the motion to approve consent judgment (Dckt. No. 72 ). The Court does so because it will end the case. The Court continues to have significant misgivings, but will enter this consent judgment in the interest of expediency. Consent Judgment to follow. The case is over. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 02/06/2023) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: With great reluctance, the Court grants the motion to approve consent judgment (Dckt. No. 72 ). The Court does so because it will end the case. The Court continues to have significant misgivings, but will enter this consent judgment in the interest of expediency. Consent Judgment to follow. The case is over. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 02/06/2023)
02/03/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report per 71 by Oakley, Inc. (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 02/03/2023)
02/03/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion to approve consent judgment 72 (Gaudio, Justin) (Entered: 02/03/2023)
02/03/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. to approve consent judgment (Gaudio, Justin) (Entered: 02/03/2023)
01/23/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the status report. (Dckt. No. 69 ) Counsel will have the Rule 26(f) conference this week. The joint initial status report is due by February 3, 2023. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 01/23/2023)
01/23/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for entry of a consent judgment (Dckt. No. 67 ) is hereby denied without prejudice. Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a consent judgment involving one, and only one, defendant: shenzhenshimeihuidawangluokejiyouxiangongsi (Defendant 38). Basically, the parties agreed to settle for $15,000, and they want this Court to enter judgment. In an ordinary case, this Court might consider entering a consent judgment, even though it is not necessary to dismiss a case. The parties could simply file a notice of dismissal or a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41. But this case is not an ordinary case. It is a Schedule A case. Plaintiff Oakley has filed suit against 40 defendants. And in the past few years alone, Oakley has filed many cases in this district, likely in the dozens. If Plaintiff's counsel got in the habit of filing for entry of a consent judgment, every time they settle with a Schedule A defendant, the wheels would come off the operation. Torrential filings would rain down on the courthouse. So, Plaintiff must come forward with a good reason, meaning a better reason than the one that they have currently offered, if they want this Court to enter a consent judgment. Schedule A cases impose extraordinary burdens, so counsel must make every effort to minimize those burdens on the judiciary. And so far, they haven't. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 01/23/2023) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for entry of a consent judgment (Dckt. No. 67 ) is hereby denied without prejudice. Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a consent judgment involving one, and only one, defendant: shenzhenshimeihuidawangluokejiyouxiangongsi (Defendant 38). Basically, the parties agreed to settle for $15,000, and they want this Court to enter judgment. In an ordinary case, this Court might consider entering a consent judgment, even though it is not necessary to dismiss a case. The parties could simply file a notice of dismissal or a stipulation of dismissal under Rule 41. But this case is not an ordinary case. It is a Schedule A case. Plaintiff Oakley has filed suit against 40 defendants. And in the past few years alone, Oakley has filed many cases in this district, likely in the dozens. If Plaintiff's counsel got in the habit of filing for entry of a consent judgment, every time they settle with a Schedule A defendant, the wheels would come off the operation. Torrential filings would rain down on the courthouse. So, Plaintiff must come forward with a good reason, meaning a better reason than the one that they have currently offered, if they want this Court to enter a consent judgment. Schedule A cases impose extraordinary burdens, so counsel must make every effort to minimize those burdens on the judiciary. And so far, they haven't. Mailed notice (jjr, ) (Entered: 01/23/2023)
01/20/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	STATUS Report per 66 by Oakley, Inc. (Christensen, Jake) (Entered: 01/20/2023)
01/20/23	Oakley Inc v. Partnerships Unincorp Associations 1:22-CV-01434 ( N.D. IL )	MEMORANDUM by Oakley, Inc. in support of motion to approve consent judgment 67 (Gaudio, Justin) (Entered: 01/20/2023)