3b Tech Inc

General

Total Cases3

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California N.D. Indiana

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L2

B

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/19/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	STATEMENT Response to Defendant 3BTech Inc. s Statement of Material Facts as to Which No Genuine Issue Exists Pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 in Support of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement re [207] Statement filed by MercAsia USA LTD. (Denkenberger PHV, John)
09/19/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	RESPONSE to Motion re [205] MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement filed by MercAsia USA LTD. (Attachments: # [1] Index of Exhibits, # [2] Exhibit A, # [3] Exhibit B, # [4] Exhibit C, # [5] Exhibit D, # [6] Exhibit E, # [7] Exhibit F, # [8] Exhibit G, # [9] Exhibit H, # [10] Exhibit I, # [11] Exhibit J, # [12] Exhibit K, # [13] Exhibit L, # [14] Exhibit M, # [15] Exhibit N, # [16] Exhibit O)(Denkenberger PHV, John) RESPONSE to Motion re [205] MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement filed by MercAsia USA LTD. (Attachments: # [1] Index of Exhibits, # [2] Exhibit A, # [3] Exhibit B, # [4] Exhibit C, # [5] Exhibit D, # [6] Exhibit E, # [7] Exhibit F, # [8] Exhibit G, # [9] Exhibit H, # [10] Exhibit I, # [11] Exhibit J, # [12] Exhibit K, # [13] Exhibit L, # [14] Exhibit M, # [15] Exhibit N, # [16] Exhibit O)(Denkenberger PHV, John)
08/22/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	ORDER: The Court previously withdrew the Brightline in this case, stayed briefing on the pending motion for summary judgment, and allowed the Plaintiff thirty days to file a motion to reopen discovery if the Plaintiff so desired (DE 209 ). The Plaintiff has now informed the Court that it does not wish to reopen discovery (DE [213] ) and the Defendants have indicated they have no objection to discovery remaining closed (DE [214] ). Therefore, the Court ORDERS that the Brightline be reinstated in this case, that the stay on briefing be lifted, and that the parties comply with the following briefing schedule for the pending motion for summary judgment (DE [205] ). Consistent with Local Rule 56-1, the Plaintiff will have 28 days from the date of this order to file its response to the motion for summary judgment and the Defendant will then have 14 days from the date of the Plaintiffs response to file its reply if it so chooses. The parties are reminded that all subsequent briefing on the motion for summary judgment must follow the requirements outlined in Local Rule 56-1. Text only entry by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/22/2022. (jss) ORDER: The Court previously withdrew the Brightline in this case, stayed briefing on the pending motion for summary judgment, and allowed the Plaintiff thirty days to file a motion to reopen discovery if the Plaintiff so desired (DE 209 ). The Plaintiff has now informed the Court that it does not wish to reopen discovery (DE [213] ) and the Defendants have indicated they have no objection to discovery remaining closed (DE [214] ). Therefore, the Court ORDERS that the Brightline be reinstated in this case, that the stay on briefing be lifted, and that the parties comply with the following briefing schedule for the pending motion for summary judgment (DE [205] ). Consistent with Local Rule 56-1, the Plaintiff will have 28 days from the date of this order to file its response to the motion for summary judgment and the Defendant will then have 14 days from the date of the Plaintiffs response to file its reply if it so chooses. The parties are reminded that all subsequent briefing on the motion for summary judgment must follow the requirements outlined in Local Rule 56-1. Text only entry by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 8/22/2022. (jss)
08/19/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE RE: MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY by 3BTech Inc. , Jianqing Zhu to [213] Notice (Other) . (Vink, Paul)
08/11/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	NOTICE by MercAsia USA LTD(an Illinois Corporation) re 209 Telephone Conference,,, Set Deadlines,,, Add and Terminate Judges,, RE: Motion to Reopen Discovery (Denkenberger PHV, John)
08/03/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	NOTICE by 3BTech Inc. re [211] Notice of Intent to Request Redaction Notice of Withdrawal of Intent to Request Redaction (Swift, Michael)
07/20/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Michael A Swift re [210] Transcript,,, (Swift, Michael)
07/13/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	TRANSCRIPT of Hearing held on February 1, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. Court Reporter Tina M. Gallucci, Telephone 260-423-3060, E-mail tina_gallucci@innd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. IMPORTANT: Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above matter. The parties have 7 calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. Within 21 days of the filing of the transcript, a Redaction Request - Transcript shall be e-filed with the Court. Access to this request will be restricted to the Court and attorneys of record in the case. If no such Notice and Redaction Request are filed, the transcript may be made remotely, electronically available to the public without redaction. Any party needing a copy of the transcript to review for redaction purposes may purchase a copy from the Court Reporter. Counsel are strongly urged to share this notice with all clients so that an informed decision about the inclusion of certain materials may be made. The responsibility for redacting these personal identifiers rests solely with counsel and the parties. The Clerk and Court Reporter will not review each transcript for compliance with this rule. Notice of Intent to Redact due 7/22/2022. Redaction Request due 8/3/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/15/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/11/2022. (tg) TRANSCRIPT of Hearing held on February 1, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. Court Reporter Tina M. Gallucci, Telephone 260-423-3060, E-mail tina_gallucci@innd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. IMPORTANT: Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above matter. The parties have 7 calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. Within 21 days of the filing of the transcript, a Redaction Request - Transcript shall be e-filed with the Court. Access to this request will be restricted to the Court and attorneys of record in the case. If no such Notice and Redaction Request are filed, the transcript may be made remotely, electronically available to the public without redaction. Any party needing a copy of the transcript to review for redaction purposes may purchase a copy from the Court Reporter. Counsel are strongly urged to share this notice with all clients so that an informed decision about the inclusion of certain materials may be made. The responsibility for redacting these personal identifiers rests solely with counsel and the parties. The Clerk and Court Reporter will not review each transcript for compliance with this rule. Notice of Intent to Redact due 7/22/2022. Redaction Request due 8/3/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/15/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/11/2022. (tg)
07/12/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 7/12/2022 before Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio. Pla appeared by attys Brian McMahon, John Whitaker. Dft Zhu appeared by atty Paul Vink. Dft 3B Tech appeared by attys Harold Moore, Michael Swift. Court hears from counsel regarding discovery and dispositive motions. The Brightline in this case is WITHDRAWN ONLY for the limited purpose of filing a motion to reopen discovery and nothing else. The anticipated motion to reopen discovery will be REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. Plaintiff will have 30 days from today to file a motion to re-open discovery which will be before the Magistrate Judge. The Court STAYS briefing on the [205] Motion for Summary Judgment pending the Magistrate Judge's ruling on the motion to reopen discovery. If discovery is re-opened the Court will order briefing on why the Court should stay further briefing on the [205] Motion for Summary Judgment. If the Magistrate Judge denies the motion to reopen discovery the Court will issue a renewed briefing schedule on the [205] Motion to Summary Judgment. (Court Reporter Ashley Stokes.) (jss) Modified on 7/12/2022 (jss). TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 7/12/2022 before Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio. Pla appeared by attys Brian McMahon, John Whitaker. Dft Zhu appeared by atty Paul Vink. Dft 3B Tech appeared by attys Harold Moore, Michael Swift. Court hears from counsel regarding discovery and dispositive motions. The Brightline in this case is WITHDRAWN ONLY for the limited purpose of filing a motion to reopen discovery and nothing else. The anticipated motion to reopen discovery will be REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr. Plaintiff will have 30 days from today to file a motion to re-open discovery which will be before the Magistrate Judge. The Court STAYS briefing on the [205] Motion for Summary Judgment pending the Magistrate Judge's ruling on the motion to reopen discovery. If discovery is re-opened the Court will order briefing on why the Court should stay further briefing on the [205] Motion for Summary Judgment. If the Magistrate Judge denies the motion to reopen discovery the Court will issue a renewed briefing schedule on the [205] Motion to Summary Judgment. (Court Reporter Ashley Stokes.) (jss) Modified on 7/12/2022 (jss).
07/05/22	Mercasia USA Ltd v. Zhu 3:17-CV-00718 ( N.D. IN )	AFFIDAVIT in Support re [205] MOTION for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement by Michael A. Swift filed by 3BTech Inc. . (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A - patent, # [2] Exhibit B - Contentions, # [3] Exhibit C - Opposite Defn, # [4] Exhibit D - Init Disc., # [5] Exhibit E - Final Disc., # [6] Exhibit F - Near Defn)(Moore, Harold)