Accu-TAC LLC

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
03/02/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/30/2022. (yl) (Entered: 03/02/2022)
03/01/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 4/30/2022. (yl)
03/01/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl)
03/01/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants` motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants` Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 03/01/2022) MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` motion for partial summary judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` motion for summary judgment of validity, and GRANTS Defendants` motion to stay by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants` Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs` Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity, and GRANTS Defendants` Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination. The case is administratively closed. Any party may file a motion to reopen the case after the conclusion of the ex parte reexamination. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for further details) (yl) (Entered: 03/01/2022)
03/01/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 03-01-2022
02/27/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court`s Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Parties` Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator (Docket Entry 82))(Pfister, Charles) (Entered: 02/27/2022)
02/27/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5 Inc. (Attachments: # [1] Parties' Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator (Docket Entry 82))(Pfister, Charles)
02/25/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Please be advised the jury trial date [24] is reset to 04/21/22 at 9am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
02/25/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Please be advised the jury trial date 24 is reset to 04/21/22 at 9am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/25/2022)
02/24/22	B 5 Inc v. Accu TAC LLC 5:20-CV-00532 ( C.D. CA )	STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Mr. Lester Savit may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 3/7/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5 Inc. (Pfister, Charles) STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Mr. Lester Savit may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 3/7/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiffs B and T Industries, LLC, B-5 Inc. (Pfister, Charles)