Accuweather Inc

General

Total Cases3
Active Cases--
Patents15
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
05/04/23
AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 5/3/2023 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (tp) (Entered: 05/04/2023)
05/03/23
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) AccuWeather, Inc.. Document filed by Diatek Licensing LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Alexander, Cortney) (Entered: 05/03/2023)
04/23/23
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 22 Amended Complaint, against AccuWeather, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Diatek Licensing LLC. Related document: 22 Amended Complaint,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 7,079,752, # 2 Exhibit B - File History for the '752 Patent, # 3 Exhibit C - US Patent No. 8,195,828, # 4 Exhibit D - File History for the '828 Patent, # 5 Exhibit E - Claim Chart for the '752 Patent, # 6 Exhibit F - Claim Chart for the '828 Patent, # 7 Exhibit G - The Role of the Patent Examiner, # 8 Exhibit H - US Patent No. 5,757,909).(Alexander, Cortney) (Entered: 04/23/2023)
03/24/23
OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. filed by AccuWeather, Inc. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dkt. 26, is granted. In the event Plaintiff decides to amend the Amended Complaint, it must file its second amended complaint within thirty days of this Opinion and Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within thirty days, and does not show good cause to excuse the failure to do so, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice and will close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 3/24/2023) (jca) (Entered: 03/24/2023)
03/24/23
OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. filed by AccuWeather, Inc. For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint, Dkt. 26, is granted. In the event Plaintiff decides to amend the Amended Complaint, it must file its second amended complaint within thirty days of this Opinion and Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within thirty days, and does not show good cause to excuse the failure to do so, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice and will close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 3/24/2023) (jca) (Entered: 03/24/2023)
08/15/22
LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Joseph Drayton dated August 15, 2022 re: Request for Oral Argument Regarding AccuWeather's Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by AccuWeather, Inc...(Drayton, Joseph) (Entered: 08/15/2022)
08/15/22
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. . Document filed by AccuWeather, Inc...(Drayton, Joseph) (Entered: 08/15/2022)
08/15/22
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. . Document filed by AccuWeather, Inc...(Drayton, Joseph) (Entered: 08/15/2022)
08/08/22
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. . Document filed by Diatek Licensing LLC..(Alexander, Cortney) (Entered: 08/08/2022)
08/08/22
RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. . Document filed by Diatek Licensing LLC..(Alexander, Cortney) (Entered: 08/08/2022)