Adam Andereson

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California N.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/16/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Aalaei, Ali) (Entered: 11/16/2020)
10/30/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING Defendants unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint 52 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Application is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their responses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 51 ) on or before 11/13/2020. (jp) (Entered: 10/30/2020)
10/30/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 11/13/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 51 filed by Defendants Unopposed Adam Andereson, Intelliarmor, Intelliarmor LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Application for Extension of Time) (Strickland, Andrew) (Entered: 10/30/2020)
10/16/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid, filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 429 Patent, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 616 Patent, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 875 Patent, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 618 Patent, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 290 Patent, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 Infringement Chart)(Aalaei, Ali). Modified on 10/19/2020 (jp). (Entered: 10/16/2020)
09/25/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING in Part Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40 -1]) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Sanho is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND the pleading, correcting the deficiencies identified herein in a manner consistent with all Rule 11 obligations. Plaintiff may not add claims or new defendants to its pleading. Any amended complaint shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action and closing of the case without further notice. (jp) (Entered: 09/25/2020) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING in Part Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40 -1]) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Sanho is GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND the pleading, correcting the deficiencies identified herein in a manner consistent with all Rule 11 obligations. Plaintiff may not add claims or new defendants to its pleading. Any amended complaint shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action and closing of the case without further notice. (jp) (Entered: 09/25/2020)
09/03/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING Matter (Doc. 40 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court finds this Motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. FRCP. 78; C.D. Cal.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 9/4/2020 at 10:30 AM., is VACATED. (jp) (Entered: 09/03/2020)
08/26/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	PLAINTIFF SANHO CORPORATIONS OBJECTIONS TO NEW EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF INTELLIARMORS REPLY in support of Sanhos Opposition to Intelliarmors motion to dismiss FAC re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 Objections filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. (Martin, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/26/2020) PLAINTIFF SANHO CORPORATIONS OBJECTIONS TO NEW EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF INTELLIARMORS REPLY in support of Sanhos Opposition to Intelliarmors motion to dismiss FAC re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 Objections filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. (Martin, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/26/2020)
08/21/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	Objections to Sanhos Request for Judicial Notice iso Motion to Dismiss Yes re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 filed by Defendants Adam Andereson, Intelliarmor. (Strickland, Andrew) (Entered: 08/21/2020)
08/21/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	REPLY Yes NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 filed by Defendants Adam Andereson, Intelliarmor. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Second Declaration of AGS iso Motion to Dismiss, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Strickland Decl., # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Strickland Decl., # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Strickland Decl., # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D to Strickland Decl., # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Second Decl. of Anderson, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Decl. of D. Gibson iso Reply)(Strickland, Andrew) (Entered: 08/21/2020) REPLY Yes NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 filed by Defendants Adam Andereson, Intelliarmor. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Second Declaration of AGS iso Motion to Dismiss, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Strickland Decl., # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Strickland Decl., # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Strickland Decl., # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D to Strickland Decl., # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Second Decl. of Anderson, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Decl. of D. Gibson iso Reply)(Strickland, Andrew) (Entered: 08/21/2020)
08/14/20	Sanho Corp v. Intelliarmor 8:20-CV-00735 ( C.D. CA )	DECLARATION of Benjamin Martin in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18)(Martin, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/14/2020) DECLARATION of Benjamin Martin in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted 40 filed by Plaintiff Sanho Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18)(Martin, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/14/2020)