Adam J Krosser

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsE.D. New York

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
09/05/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	Joint MOTION to Bifurcate by Dynamite Marketing, Inc.. (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 09/05/2023)
09/05/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	Letter re Status Report by Dynamite Marketing, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amended Joint Proposed Pretrial Order) (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 09/05/2023)
09/01/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	Minute Entry for proceedings held on 9/1/2023 before Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst: Civil Cause for Pre-Trial Conference. Counsel for Plaintiff: Michael Cukor, Vincent McGeary. Counsel for Defendant: Steven Charles Berlowitz, John R. Donohue, Jr., Jon M. Gibbs. FTR #: 11:00-11:24, via AT&T Teleconference. Case called. Counsel for all sides present. For the reasons stated on the record, all relief requested in Plaintiff's letter at DE 103 concerning discovery issues is DENIED. The parties shall file a joint status report by 9/5/2023 at 4:30PM that must (1) describe the parties efforts to narrow the eight pending in limine motions and the results of those efforts, (2) state whether the parties unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction for all purposes in this matter. If the parties unanimously so consent, they shall separately file the consent form contemporaneously with the filing of their joint status report. See DE 4 (attaching "a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and electronically filed only if all parties wish to consent."). Either party "may withhold... consent without adverse substantive consequences." Id. (emphasis removed). (3) state, if the parties do not unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction, whether the parties will proceed with or seek to adjourn the scheduled 9/11/2023 start date for their trial before District Judge Gary R. Brown, and (4) attach, if the parties do not unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction, a revised joint proposed pretrial order consistent with the Court's instruction to increase the parties' stipulations, decrease the number of witnesses, and decrease the number of exhibits. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 9/1/2023. (CT) (Entered: 09/01/2023) Minute Entry for proceedings held on 9/1/2023 before Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst: Civil Cause for Pre-Trial Conference. Counsel for Plaintiff: Michael Cukor, Vincent McGeary. Counsel for Defendant: Steven Charles Berlowitz, John R. Donohue, Jr., Jon M. Gibbs. FTR #: 11:00-11:24, via AT&T Teleconference. Case called. Counsel for all sides present. For the reasons stated on the record, all relief requested in Plaintiff's letter at DE 103 concerning discovery issues is DENIED. The parties shall file a joint status report by 9/5/2023 at 4:30PM that must (1) describe the parties efforts to narrow the eight pending in limine motions and the results of those efforts, (2) state whether the parties unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction for all purposes in this matter. If the parties unanimously so consent, they shall separately file the consent form contemporaneously with the filing of their joint status report. See DE 4 (attaching "a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and electronically filed only if all parties wish to consent."). Either party "may withhold... consent without adverse substantive consequences." Id. (emphasis removed). (3) state, if the parties do not unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction, whether the parties will proceed with or seek to adjourn the scheduled 9/11/2023 start date for their trial before District Judge Gary R. Brown, and (4) attach, if the parties do not unanimously consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction, a revised joint proposed pretrial order consistent with the Court's instruction to increase the parties' stipulations, decrease the number of witnesses, and decrease the number of exhibits. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 9/1/2023. (CT) (Entered: 09/01/2023)
08/31/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	ORDER: The Court received the parties' joint proposed pretrial order at DE 105 . The parties are directed to read District Judge Gary R. Brown's Individual Practice Rule III concerning pretrial procedure, and Judge Brown's decision in Fields v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, 594 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D.N.Y. 2022) prior to the 9/1/2023 11:00 AM pretrial conference before the undersigned. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/31/2023. (CB) (Entered: 08/31/2023) ORDER: The Court received the parties' joint proposed pretrial order at DE 105 . The parties are directed to read District Judge Gary R. Brown's Individual Practice Rule III concerning pretrial procedure, and Judge Brown's decision in Fields v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, 594 F. Supp. 3d 530 (E.D.N.Y. 2022) prior to the 9/1/2023 11:00 AM pretrial conference before the undersigned. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/31/2023. (CB) (Entered: 08/31/2023)
08/30/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	Proposed Pretrial Order by Dynamite Marketing, Inc. (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 08/30/2023)
08/30/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	EXHIBIT 1 to Plaintiff's Letter Regarding Sherman's Alleged Failure To Preserve DKT 103 by Dynamite Marketing, Inc.. (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 08/30/2023)
08/30/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	ELECTRONIC SCHEDULING ORDER: Due to an apparent technical issue, the Court is unable to open DE 103 -1, which is Exhibit 1 to Plaintiff's Letter Regarding Sherman's Alleged Failure To Preserve. Plaintiff shall re-file that exhibit forthwith. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 8/30/2023. (CB) (Entered: 08/30/2023)
08/29/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	Letter Regarding Sherman's Alleged Failure To Preserve by Dynamite Marketing, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Supporting Emails, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Catalog Images) (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 08/29/2023)
08/29/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	EXHIBIT 2 to Proposed Jury Charges DKT 99 by Dynamite Marketing, Inc.. (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 08/29/2023)
08/29/23	Dynamite Marketing Inc v. Wowline Inc 2:19-CV-03067 ( E.D. NY )	EXHIBIT 1 - to Proposed Jury Charges DKT 99 by Dynamite Marketing, Inc.. (Cukor, Michael) (Entered: 08/29/2023)