Akamai Technologies Inc
General
Total Cases77
Active Cases6
Patents706
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
B
PTAB
L5
E
CAFC
L2
A
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 08/28/24 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to file a redacted version of its Letter Brief (D.I. 157) to September 4, 2024 - filed by Equil IP Holdings LLC. (Moore, David) (Entered: 08/28/2024) | |
| 08/28/24 | MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiffs new AIC theory is appropriate. Defendant'smotion to strike Dr. Almeroth's AIC theory and portions of Mr. Kennedy's report to the extent that they rely on the AIC theory is GRANTED (see Memorandum Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/28/2024. (nms) (Entered: 08/28/2024) | |
| 08/27/24 | [SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re 151 MOTION for Leave to Supplement Infringement Contentions Regarding "A Host Computer" Limitation, filed by Equil IP Holdings LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits D-E)(Palapura, Bindu) Modified on 8/28/2024 (nms). (Entered: 08/27/2024) | |
| 08/27/24 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard G. Andrews - Discovery Conference held on 8/27/2024. Local counsel present for Plaintiff: A. Brown. Local counsel present for Defendant: A. Poff. The transcript of the proceedings will serve as a partial order of the Court regarding the oral ruling made. The Court will issue a paper order the disputes it took under advisement. (Court Reporter Heather Triozzi.) (nms) (Entered: 08/27/2024) | |
| 08/26/24 | ORAL ORDER: The redacted filing (D.I. 163 ) is REJECTED because parts of it are redacted in its entirety. Absent a compelling reason, supported by a statement under oath by a party, redactions in their entirety are impermissible; redactions must be done so as to redact the least possible amount of the materials submitted. Failure to make a good faith attempt at such redactions may result in sanctions, the most common of which would be simply unsealing the entire filing. Redacting in its entirety a document, or parts of it, that contains publicly available materials is prima facie evidence of bad faith. A revised redacted filing is DUE within five business days. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/26/2024. (nms) (Entered: 08/26/2024) | |
| 08/23/24 | REDACTED VERSION of 155 Letter, by Akamai Technologies, Inc.. (Vrana, Robert) Modified on 8/26/2024 (nms). (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
| 08/23/24 | SO ORDERED granting 161 MOTION and Proposed Order Granting Limited Exemption from the Standing Order Regarding Personal Electronic Devices Regarding the August 27, 2024 Discovery Conference. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/23/2024. (nms) (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
| 08/23/24 | CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf for D.I. 161 has been replaced with an amended version. A signature line has been added to the filing. The NEF for D.I. 161 has been regenerated. (nms) (Entered: 08/23/2024) | |
| 08/22/24 | MOTION and Proposed Order Granting Limited Exemption from the Standing Order Regarding Personal Electronic Devices Regarding the August 27, 2024 Discovery Conference - filed by Equil IP Holdings LLC. (Brown, Andrew) (Main Document 161 replaced on 8/23/2024) (nms). (Entered: 08/22/2024) | |
| 08/20/24 | Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews from Adam W. Poff regarding a response to Plaintiff Equil's Motion to Strike Letter - re 156 Letter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 through 7)(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 08/20/2024) |