Akefitshop
General
Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents--
--
--
--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 05/12/22 | REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Minute Order) (lom) (Entered: 05/12/2022) | |
| 05/12/22 | MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Although it has now been nine (9) days since the May 2 deadline, Plaintiff has not yet filed proofs of service for the remaining Defendant. The Court thereforeDISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 05/12/2022) | |
| 05/12/22 | Initial Civil Docket 12-02-2021 | |
| 04/01/22 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court has received Plaintiff's Proof of Service with respect to Defendant Covolo Store, (Dkt. No. 17), and has also reviewed Plaintiff's filing concerning its efforts to serve the remaining Defendants in this case, (Dkt. No. 19). Given the apparent difficulty of locating contact information for the remaining Defendants, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline for filing the requisite proofs of service, from March 2, 2022, to May 2, 2022. This constitutes a sixty (60) day extension of the deadline for filing proofs of service. If adequate proofs of service are not filed by May 2, 2022, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/01/2022) | |
| 03/25/22 | RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Eryi Zhangto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, 16 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Yang, Elizabeth) (Entered: 03/25/2022) | |
| 03/22/22 | NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) 17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). The filer used the event, Proof of Service (subsequent documents), for docketing this filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) (Entered: 03/22/2022) | |
| 03/18/22 | PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Eryi Zhang, served on March 18, 2022. (Yang, Elizabeth) (Entered: 03/18/2022) | |
| 03/15/22 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 3/28/2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the Defendant(s). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 03/15/2022) | |
| 03/09/22 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order DISCHARGING Order to Show Cause and DENYING Preliminary Injunction by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court now DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause 14 and DENIES the requested preliminary injunction 11 . The Court also notes that Plaintiff failed to fulfill the Court's order to serve the relevant documents on Defendants and to file a proof of service, which further supports denying the requested relief. Pursuant to the above, the associated show cause hearing, set for 3/11/2022, is hereby VACATED. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 03/09/2022) | |
| 02/14/22 | MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order DENYING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and GRANTING the Request for an Order to Show Cause by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order 11 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Request for an Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue 11 is GRANTED and the Court orders as follows. (1) The Court issues an order to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue. (2) The Court sets a hearing on the order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue for 3/11/2022 at 10:00 AM. (3) Plaintiff may file any supplemental brief in support of the requested preliminary injunction, taking into account the rulings in this Order, no later than 2/21/2021. (4) Defendants are ordered to file their opposition to Plaintiff's initial and supplemental filings, taking into account the rulings in this Order, no later than 2/28/2022. (6) Within 48 hours of issuance of this Order, Plaintiff shall serve on Defendants, via any contact information Plaintiff may obtain, including email addresses, a copy of this Order, the TRO Application, the Complaint, and all other required case-initiating documents, as well as all attachments to the foregoing documents. Upon serving a copy of these documents, Plaintiff shall file a declaration setting forth the efforts undertaken to find and serve Defendants. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 02/14/2022) |