AMTLJ US

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
11/05/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MEMORANDUM by Pathway IP LLC in support of motion for entry of default,, motion for default judgment, [225] (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee, # [2] Declaration of Sason Gabay)(Haque, Sameeul) (Entered: 11/05/2024)
11/05/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for entry of default Presented before District Judge , MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for default judgment as to Defendants listed in Exhibit A Presented before District Judge (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A)(Haque, Sameeul) (Entered: 11/05/2024)
10/31/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is certain Defendants' motion for scheduling conference and expedited hearing on Defendant's motions to dismiss for misjoinder and dissolve preliminary injunction [218] . Certain Defendants have also filed a notice of motion for presentment for hearing on 11/05/2024 at 4:00 p.m. [222] The Court reminds the parties that pursuant to its Standing Order, "[p]arties are not to schedule motion presentment hearings... Parties should not contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy about scheduling a motion presentment hearing. If a party believes a motion presentment hearing is necessary, the party must file a motion requesting a hearing on the docket, which must indicate whether the opposing party opposes the motion, and setting forth a brief explanation as to why a hearing is necessary." As the Court understands the purpose of certain Defendants' motion for hearing was to bring to the Court's attention certain Defendants' pending motions, the Court does not believe the hearing is necessary at this time. Certain Defendants' motions remain under advisement. As to certain Defendants request for a Rule 16 conference, that request is denied. The Court reminds the parties that this matter was referred to Judge Gilbert for the purposes of discovery supervision, and Judge Gilbert has previously entered a Rule 16 Scheduling Order. R. 191. For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied, and the Court strikes the presentment of hearing date. [218] [222] Mailed notice. (jcm) (Entered: 10/31/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is certain Defendants' motion for scheduling conference and expedited hearing on Defendant's motions to dismiss for misjoinder and dissolve preliminary injunction [218] . Certain Defendants have also filed a notice of motion for presentment for hearing on 11/05/2024 at 4:00 p.m. [222] The Court reminds the parties that pursuant to its Standing Order, "[p]arties are not to schedule motion presentment hearings... Parties should not contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy about scheduling a motion presentment hearing. If a party believes a motion presentment hearing is necessary, the party must file a motion requesting a hearing on the docket, which must indicate whether the opposing party opposes the motion, and setting forth a brief explanation as to why a hearing is necessary." As the Court understands the purpose of certain Defendants' motion for hearing was to bring to the Court's attention certain Defendants' pending motions, the Court does not believe the hearing is necessary at this time. Certain Defendants' motions remain under advisement. As to certain Defendants request for a Rule 16 conference, that request is denied. The Court reminds the parties that this matter was referred to Judge Gilbert for the purposes of discovery supervision, and Judge Gilbert has previously entered a Rule 16 Scheduling Order. R. 191. For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied, and the Court strikes the presentment of hearing date. [218] [222] Mailed notice. (jcm) (Entered: 10/31/2024)
10/30/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder [105] . The Court has received inquiry as to the status of ruling on the pending motion. As to the label of the pending motion as an "emergency," pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, the Court hears "emergency motions only in exceptional circumstances after making a preliminary determination of whether an actual emergency exists. Emergency matters must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties." Here, Defendants' motion requests dismissal for misjoinder. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, "[m]isjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party. The court may also sever any claim against a party." Accordingly, as Rule 21 is generally not a ground for dismissal, and because the Court can at any time add or drop a party, the motion is not an emergency. The motion remains under advisement. Mailed notice. (jcm) (Entered: 10/30/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder [105] . The Court has received inquiry as to the status of ruling on the pending motion. As to the label of the pending motion as an "emergency," pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, the Court hears "emergency motions only in exceptional circumstances after making a preliminary determination of whether an actual emergency exists. Emergency matters must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties." Here, Defendants' motion requests dismissal for misjoinder. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, "[m]isjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party. The court may also sever any claim against a party." Accordingly, as Rule 21 is generally not a ground for dismissal, and because the Court can at any time add or drop a party, the motion is not an emergency. The motion remains under advisement. Mailed notice. (jcm) (Entered: 10/30/2024)
10/30/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of motion for hearing,, [218] before Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/5/2024 at 04:00 PM. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit A- Motion [DE 218])(Liu, Jianyin) (Entered: 10/30/2024)
10/29/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Scheduling Conference and Expedited Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder and Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [218] . The Court further notes that the Motion for Status Conference [216] was stricken by the Moving Defendants ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai and AIXIANGPAI, see [217] . In the pending Motion [218] , the Moving Defendants seek a status conference regarding the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [116] , Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder [111] and Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [104] , but those motions are before the District Judge. Therefore, this Motion [218] is improperly presented before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must notice the Motion [218] for presentment before Judge Valderrama. Mailed notice (ber, ) (Entered: 10/29/2024) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Scheduling Conference and Expedited Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder and Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [218] . The Court further notes that the Motion for Status Conference [216] was stricken by the Moving Defendants ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai and AIXIANGPAI, see [217] . In the pending Motion [218] , the Moving Defendants seek a status conference regarding the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [116] , Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder [111] and Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [104] , but those motions are before the District Judge. Therefore, this Motion [218] is improperly presented before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must notice the Motion [218] for presentment before Judge Valderrama. Mailed notice (ber, ) (Entered: 10/29/2024)
10/29/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) Lanyuantai (Defendant 53) without prejudice (Lee, Nicholas) (Entered: 10/29/2024)
10/28/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Weilisi, Kaiess by Ziqi Yu (Yu, Ziqi) (Entered: 10/28/2024)
10/21/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116] , MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge [104] , MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before Magistrate Judge (Liu, Jianyin) (Entered: 10/21/2024) MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116] , MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge [104] , MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before Magistrate Judge (Liu, Jianyin) (Entered: 10/21/2024)
10/21/24	Pathway IP LLC v. Individuals Corps Ltd 1:24-CV-05218 ( N.D. IL )	NOTICE by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116] , MOT [216] of Striking Filing of Motion for Status Conference [DE 216] (Liu, Jianyin) (Entered: 10/21/2024) NOTICE by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116] , MOT [216] of Striking Filing of Motion for Status Conference [DE 216] (Liu, Jianyin) (Entered: 10/21/2024)