Arev Distributing Inc

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/10/22	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 55 , the Court ORDERS that this entire action and all causes of action therein is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys` fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) (Entered: 06/10/2022)
06/09/22	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	Final Civil Docket 06-09-2022
06/08/22	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Wheel Pros, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Zfaty, Isaac) (Entered: 06/08/2022)
11/18/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER RE: JURY/COURT TRIAL I. SCHEDULE II. TRIAL PREPARATION III. CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES: Trial: 10/11/2022 at 8:30 a.m., Jury Trial, Final Pretrial Conference, Hearing on Motions in Limine: 9/23/2022 at 11:00 a.m (see document for further details) (bm) (Entered: 11/18/2021)
11/17/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 7/15/2022. (cb) (Entered: 11/17/2021)
11/17/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the November 19, 2021, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. The Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference (Dkt. No. 51) is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/17/2021) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the November 19, 2021, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. The Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference (Dkt. No. 51) is denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/17/2021)
11/16/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	Joint STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26(F) Scheduling Conference from 11/19/2021 to 12/17/2021 filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Wheel Pros, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Zfaty, Isaac) (Entered: 11/16/2021)
11/10/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Joint Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet ; estimated length of trial 10-14 days, filed by Plaintiff Wheel Pros, LLC, Counter Defendant Wheel Pros, LLC.. (Zfaty, Isaac) (Entered: 11/10/2021)
11/03/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The parties` Joint Rule 26(f) Report proposes a claim construction hearing and associated deadlines. But because this case involves only two design patents, the Court finds that claim construction is not necessary and declines to set a claim construction hearing. However, the parties are welcome adhere to such deadlines among themselves. Also, the Joint Rule 26(f) Report does not include the necessary Schedule Worksheet. Furthermore, the parties failed to propose specific dates for some events, some evets are too close together, and some events are omitted. The parties are ORDERED to file a COMPLETED Schedule Worksheet that includes all dates with a realistic schedule by November 10, 2021. The Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to November 19, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/03/2021) (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The parties` Joint Rule 26(f) Report proposes a claim construction hearing and associated deadlines. But because this case involves only two design patents, the Court finds that claim construction is not necessary and declines to set a claim construction hearing. However, the parties are welcome adhere to such deadlines among themselves. Also, the Joint Rule 26(f) Report does not include the necessary Schedule Worksheet. Furthermore, the parties failed to propose specific dates for some events, some evets are too close together, and some events are omitted. The parties are ORDERED to file a COMPLETED Schedule Worksheet that includes all dates with a realistic schedule by November 10, 2021. The Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to November 19, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/03/2021)
10/13/21	Wheel Pros v. Arev Distributing 2:21-CV-04207 ( C.D. CA )	ORDER TO CONTINUE RULE 26(F) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 47 , the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference is continued to 11/5/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (gk) (Entered: 10/13/2021)