Auctiva LLC

General

Total Cases1

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsC.D. California

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L3

A

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
01/10/22	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). RE: 9 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) (Entered: 01/10/2022)
01/10/22	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). RE: 9 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) (Entered: 01/10/2022)
01/07/22	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	Updated Civil Docket 17-11-2021
01/07/22	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	Updated Civil Docket 17-11-2021
12/27/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than DECEMBER 30, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is the responsibility of plaintiff to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept: PROOF OF SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2021) SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than DECEMBER 30, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is the responsibility of plaintiff to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept: PROOF OF SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2021)
12/27/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than DECEMBER 30, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is the responsibility of plaintiff to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept: PROOF OF SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2021) SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than DECEMBER 30, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is the responsibility of plaintiff to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept: PROOF OF SERVICE ON ALL DEFENDANTS. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/27/2021)
11/17/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	Updated Civil Docket 03-10-2021
11/17/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	Updated Civil Docket 03-10-2021
08/25/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) (Entered: 08/25/2021)
08/25/21	Lifeproxy LLC v. Auctiva LLC 8:21-CV-01370 ( C.D. CA )	INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER. (kd) (Entered: 08/25/2021)