Avery-Dennison Corp
General
Total Cases40
Active Cases--
Patents1,562
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L3
E
PTAB
L2
D
CAFC
L3
A
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 05/02/24 | Order of USCA for the Federal Circuit, USCA # 24-1673, re Notice of Appeal 617 . The appeal is dismissed. Order voluntarily dismissing appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) 8 ; issuing mandate. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. (ecp) (Entered: 05/02/2024) | |
| 04/29/24 | Satisfaction re Judgment 616 [Unopposed Stipulation of Satisfaction of Judgment] by Adasa Inc.. Filed by Adasa Inc.. (Suder, Jonathan) (Entered: 04/29/2024) | |
| 04/05/24 | Appeal Information Sheet transmitted to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals re Notice of Appeal 617 . (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Appeal, # 2 Related Opinion 1 Docket 205, # 3 Related Opinion 2 Docket 430, # 4 Related Opinion 3 Docket 611, # 5 Related Opinion 4 Docket 614, # 6 Judgment being Appealed Docket 616) (jw) (Entered: 04/05/2024) | |
| 04/04/24 | Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from Judgment 616 Filing fee $605 collected; Agency Tracking ID AORDC-9355502: . Filed by Avery Dennison Corporation. (Roberts, Owen) (Entered: 04/04/2024) | |
| 03/07/24 | AMENDED FINAL RULE 58 JUDGMENT signed on 3/7/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai. (jk) (Entered: 03/07/2024) | |
| 03/04/24 | Supplemental Declaration of Jonathan T. Suder in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees. (DOCUMENT RESTRICTED ACCORDING TO PROTECTIVE ORDER) Filed by Adasa Inc.. (Related document(s): Motion for Attorney Fees, 585 .) (Suder, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/04/2024) | |
| 02/27/24 | Opinion and Order signed on 2/27/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Plaintiff's Motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 is GRANTED. Prior to submitting a proposed Final Judgment, Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement its declaration of attorneys' fees to include the attorneys' fees that reasonably accumulated during its post-trial motions practice. Plaintiff's Motion for prejudgment interest pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 is GRANTED in part DENIED in part. Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit a proposed Final Judgment, calculating all awards consistent with the Court's rulings on post-trial motions. (jk) (Entered: 02/27/2024) | |
| 02/09/24 | Opinion and Order signed on 2/9/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: For the reasons explained above, Defendant's Motions (ECF No. 592 ) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(a) and 60(b) are DENIED. (jk) (Entered: 02/09/2024) | |
| 02/07/24 | Opinion and Order signed on 2/7/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Defendant's Motions (ECF No. 591 ) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b), 60(b), and 59(e) are DENIED. (jk) (Entered: 02/07/2024) | |
| 01/25/24 | Opinion and Order signed on 1/25/2024 by Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai: Consistent with the reasoning set forth in the Federal Circuit's Mandate, the Court finds financial sanctions in the amount of $.0025 per tag, applied to each of the tags that Defendant failed to disclose until after the first trial is appropriate. (jk) (Entered: 01/25/2024) |