Baseus Accessories LLC

General

Total Cases2
Active Cases--
Patents--
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
08/08/23
NOTATION ORDER - The Court has been notified that the claims in this case have been resolved. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a status report on 9/15/2023 if a dismissal entry has not been filed by that date. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 8/8/2023. (merc) (Entered: 08/08/2023)
07/26/23
STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Defendant Baseus Accessories LLC. (Kraeutler, Eric) (Entered: 07/26/2023)
01/20/23
STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Defendant Baseus Accessories LLC. (Kraeutler, Eric) (Entered: 01/20/2023)
07/25/22
Set/Reset Deadlines per 38 : Status Report due by 1/23/2023 and every six (6) months thereafter (kk2) (Entered: 07/25/2022)
07/22/22
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Baseus's 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. MPS's claims for contributory infringement as to each patent are DISMISSED. Its remaining claims survive. Baseus's Motion to Stay is GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED to submit a status report every six months on the status of MPSs claims against Meraki in the Northern District of California.Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 7/22/2022. (tb) (Entered: 07/22/2022)
07/22/22
Case Stayed pursuant to Opinion and Order docketed 7/22/2022 by Judge Sarah D. Morrison. (tb) (Entered: 07/22/2022)
03/29/22
NOTICE OF A RELATED CASE DEVELOPMENT by Defendant Baseus Accessories LLC re 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, 33 RULE 26(f) REPORT, 35 RESPONSE in Opposition and 36 REPLY to Response to Motion. (Kraeutler, Eric) Modified text and created links on 3/29/2022 (er). (Entered: 03/29/2022)
03/17/22
REPLY to Response to Motion re 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum In Support filed by Defendant Baseus Accessories LLC. (Barber, Andrew) Modified on 3/18/2022 to clarify text (kk2) (Entered: 03/17/2022)
03/04/22
RESPONSE in Opposition re 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum In Support filed by Plaintiffs Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co. Ltd, Monolithic Power Systems Inc. (Esterhay, John) (Entered: 03/04/2022)
03/04/22
NOTATION ORDER - Based on the Rule 26 (f) Report (Doc. 33 ), the Parties disagree on whether discovery should be stayed in this case. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for March 9, 2022 is VACATED to allow briefing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Stay (Doc. 20 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/4/21. (jr) (Entered: 03/04/2022)