Bounts Technologies Ltd

General

Total Cases1
Active Cases--
Patents1
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
02/06/25
ORDER OF 2/6/25 THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AND ITS COUNSEL (ECF NOS. 11,24) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE: MIA R. PEREZ ON 2/6/25. 2/6/25 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) (Entered: 02/06/2025)
02/06/25
ORDER OF 2/6/25 FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 28) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 26) IS DEEMED PROPERLY FILED. DEFENDANT SHALL RESPOND TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER; AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 9ECF NO. 18) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY JUDGE: MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 2/6/25. 2/6/25 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt) (Entered: 02/06/2025)
02/06/25
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION.. SIGNED BY JUDGE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 2/6/25. 2/6/25 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt) (Entered: 02/06/2025)
10/19/23
REPLY to Response to Motion re [28] MOTION to Strike [26] Amended Complaint, [27] Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by CONNECTIFY, INC.. (Attachments: # [1] Certificate of Service)(Kats, Samantha) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
10/17/23
RESPONSE in Opposition re [28] MOTION to Strike [26] Amended Complaint, [27] Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit Declaration of Levi Russell, # [2] Exhibit counsel correspondence, # [3] Exhibit counsel correspondence, # [4] Certificate of Service, # [5] Text of Proposed Order)(ZENGER, TODD) (Entered: 10/17/2023)
10/17/23
REPLY to Response to Motion re [24] Second MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 Against Plaintiff and Its Counsel Ryan E. Borneman filed by CONNECTIFY, INC.. (Attachments: # [1] Certificate of Service)(Kats, Samantha) (Entered: 10/17/2023)
10/13/23
RESPONSE in Opposition re [24] Second MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 Against Plaintiff and Its Counsel filed by Ryan E Borneman. (Attachments: # [1] Declaration of Ryan E. Borneman)(BORNEMAN, RYAN) (Entered: 10/13/2023)
10/10/23
ORDER THAT consideration of the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Ryan E. Borneman to Respond to Connectify Inc.s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (ECF No. 29) it is hereby ORDERED that Ryan E. Bornemans response to Connectify Inc.s Motion is extended to October 13, 2023. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MIA ROBERTS PEREZ ON 10/10/2023.10/10/2023 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg) (Entered: 10/10/2023)
10/10/23
REPLY to Response to Motion re [24] Second MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 Against Plaintiff and Its Counsel filed by CONNECTIFY, INC.. (Attachments: # [1] Certificate of Service)(Kats, Samantha) (Entered: 10/10/2023)
10/06/23
RESPONSE in Opposition re [24] Second MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 Against Plaintiff and Its Counsel filed by BOUNTS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.. (Attachments: # [1] Exhibit Declaration of Levi Russell, # [2] Exhibit Order Governing Proceedings - Patent Cases, # [3] Exhibit U.S. Pat. No. 9,258,309, # [4] Text of Proposed Order, # [5] Certificate of Service)(ZENGER, TODD) (Entered: 10/06/2023)