Carjamz Com Inc

General

Total Cases4

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsN.D. Illinois

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	Permanent Injunction
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	Stipulated Judgment and Consent Decree Signed by the Honorable Iain D. Johnston on 4/20/2021: (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/20/2021)
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The joint motion to approve the parties agreed judgment and consent decree 72 is granted. The Clerk will enter the agreed judgment and consent decree as a separate docket entry. All other dates and deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/20/2021)
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The joint motion to approve the parties' agreed judgment and consent decree 72 is granted. The Clerk will enter the agreed judgment and consent decree as a separate docket entry. All other dates and deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/20/2021)
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Telephone conference held on 4/20/2021. This hearing is under seal and will not be released without an order from this Court. A revised consent decree shall be submitted by way of Judge Johnstons proposed order email portal. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/20/2021)
04/20/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Telephone conference held on 4/20/2021. This hearing is under seal and will not be released without an order from this Court. A revised consent decree shall be submitted by way of Judge Johnston's proposed order email portal. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/20/2021)
04/15/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: By agreement of the parties a telephonic status hearing is set for 4/20/2021 at 10:00 AM. Counsel of record will receive an email prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-557-8511 and the access code is 2660444. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/15/2021) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: By agreement of the parties a telephonic status hearing is set for 4/20/2021 at 10:00 AM. Counsel of record will receive an email prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is 888-557-8511 and the access code is 2660444. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/15/2021)
04/13/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Before the Court is the parties joint motion for a stipulated judgment and consent decree 72 . The Court appreciates the efforts the parties put into reaching their agreement to settle. But upon reviewing the language of the proposed order, the Court is concerned about its ability to retain jurisdiction to enforce any terms that are not incorporated into the consent decree, and are instead found only in a confidential settlement agreement that is not in the record. See, e.g., Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assn v. Am. Express Co., 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006). The Court will discuss this concern with the parties during a telephonic status hearing, which will be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 408 to facilitate discussion of any confidential terms of the parties agreement. By 4/20/2021 the parties should confer and provide to the Courts operations specialist three dates on which all are available for a telephonic status hearing. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/13/2021) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Before the Court is the parties joint motion for a stipulated judgment and consent decree 72 . The Court appreciates the efforts the parties put into reaching their agreement to settle. But upon reviewing the language of the proposed order, the Court is concerned about its ability to retain jurisdiction to enforce any terms that are not incorporated into the consent decree, and are instead found only in a confidential settlement agreement that is not in the record. See, e.g., Blue Cross & Blue Shield Assn v. Am. Express Co., 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006). The Court will discuss this concern with the parties during a telephonic status hearing, which will be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 408 to facilitate discussion of any confidential terms of the parties agreement. By 4/20/2021 the parties should confer and provide to the Courts operations specialist three dates on which all are available for a telephonic status hearing. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/13/2021)
04/13/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Before the Court is the parties' joint motion for a stipulated judgment and consent decree 72 . The Court appreciates the efforts the parties put into reaching their agreement to settle. But upon reviewing the language of the proposed order, the Court is concerned about its ability to retain jurisdiction to enforce any terms that are not incorporated into the consent decree, and are instead found only in a confidential settlement agreement that is not in the record. See, e.g., Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n v. Am. Express Co., 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006). The Court will discuss this concern with the parties during a telephonic status hearing, which will be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 408 to facilitate discussion of any confidential terms of the parties' agreement. By 4/20/2021 the parties should confer and provide to the Court's operations specialist three dates on which all are available for a telephonic status hearing. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/13/2021) MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: Before the Court is the parties' joint motion for a stipulated judgment and consent decree 72 . The Court appreciates the efforts the parties put into reaching their agreement to settle. But upon reviewing the language of the proposed order, the Court is concerned about its ability to retain jurisdiction to enforce any terms that are not incorporated into the consent decree, and are instead found only in a confidential settlement agreement that is not in the record. See, e.g., Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n v. Am. Express Co., 467 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2006). The Court will discuss this concern with the parties during a telephonic status hearing, which will be governed by Fed. R. Evid. 408 to facilitate discussion of any confidential terms of the parties' agreement. By 4/20/2021 the parties should confer and provide to the Court's operations specialist three dates on which all are available for a telephonic status hearing. (yxp, ) (Entered: 04/13/2021)
04/12/21	Putco Inc v. Carjamz Com Inc 3:20-CV-50109 ( N.D. IL )	MOTION by Plaintiff Putco, Inc., Counter Defendant Putco, Inc. to approve consent judgment (Joint) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1_Stipulated Judgment and Consent Decree)(Kennedy, Jonathan) (Entered: 04/12/2021)