Cartessa Aesthetics LLC
General
Total Cases13
Active Cases1
Patents--
Ratings
Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
L4
E
CAFC
--
--
--
Analytics
Cases
Litigated Patents
Ratings Trends
Recent Dockets
Entered | Case | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 10/18/24 | NOTICE OF APPEAL as to [110] Judgment,,,, [97] Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,, Order on Motion to Strike,,,,,,,, by Edge Systems LLC. Filing fee $ 605, receipt number ANYEDC-18402775. (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 10/18/2024) | |
| 10/18/24 | Electronic Index to Record on Appeal sent to US Court of Appeals. [112] Notice of Appeal Documents are available via Pacer. For docket entries without a hyperlink or for documents under seal, contact the court and we'll arrange for the document(s) to be made available to you. (KS) (Entered: 10/18/2024) | |
| 10/15/24 | Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: # [1] Judgment) (JC) (Entered: 10/15/2024) | |
| 10/15/24 | JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Edge and against Cartessa that claim 1 of U.S.Patent No. 9,550,052 is not invalid. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Cartessa and against Edge as to the claims of infringement of claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 9,550,052 as set forth in Edges Complaint; 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Edge of no unclean hands as to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,641,591; 8,066,716; 8,337,513; 9,775,646, and 9,550,052. 4. Edges claims against Cartessa alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,775,646 are dismissed with prejudice; 5. Edges claims against Cartessa alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,641,591; 8,066,716; and 8,337,513 are dismissed without prejudice; and 6. Each party will bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Because no claims are remaining in this action, the Court expressly directs the Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 10/15/2024. (JC) (Entered: 10/15/2024) | |
| 10/11/24 | STIPULATION of Dismissal and Request to Enter Final Judgment by Edge Systems LLC (Attachments: # [1] Stipulated Proposed Final Judgment) (Razai, Ali) (Entered: 10/11/2024) | |
| 10/07/24 | ORDER granting [108] Motion for Extension of Time to File. This is the 2nd application seeking additional time to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order which was made after Court business hours. Accordingly, the Joint Pre-trial Order is to be submitted by October 11th. No further adjournments will be given. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 10/7/2024. (LV) (Entered: 10/07/2024) | |
| 10/04/24 | Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed PreTrial Order by Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order) (Keyko, David) (Entered: 10/04/2024) | |
| 09/10/24 | ORDER granting [107] Motion for Extension of Time to File. The time to submit the proposed JPTO is extended to October 7, 2024. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 9/10/2024. (LV) (Entered: 09/10/2024) | |
| 09/09/24 | Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Proposed Pretrial Order by Edge Systems LLC. (Attachments: # [1] Proposed Order) (Murray, Sean) (Entered: 09/09/2024) | |
| 08/22/24 | ORDER: The parties are directed to confer and submit a proposed joint pretrial order in compliance with the undersigned's individual rules, which, per Rule III of the undersigned's Individual Rules, shall be prepared under the supervision of the assigned Magistrate Judge within 30 (thirty days) form the date of this Order. The parties are reminded that they may consider consenting to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge for all purposes for the remainder of the case. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/22/2024. (LJ) (Entered: 08/22/2024) |