Casetagram Ltd

General

Total Cases3

Active Cases1

Patents--

CourtsD. Colorado N.D. Georgia W.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
06/10/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to MARGARET A. BURKE. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3) (Entered: 06/10/2024) ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to MARGARET A. BURKE. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3) (Entered: 06/10/2024)
06/06/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Amended MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Cabrach J. Connor for Margaret A. Burke by on behalf of Casetagram Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Connor, Cabrach) (Entered: 06/06/2024)
06/04/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order DENYING 36 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Robert Pitman. This motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as Ms. Burke's indicated co-counsel is only admitted pro hac vice. Ms. Burke may file an amended motion for pro hac vice if she wishes. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 06/04/2024)
05/28/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	ORDER GRANTING 28 Opposed MOTION to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of the Asserted Patents and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED parties STATUS REPORT due by 8/26/2024. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (cc3) (Entered: 05/28/2024)
05/22/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Sam Yip as to MARGARET ALICE BURKE ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18797416) by on behalf of Casetagram Limited. (Yip, Sam) Modified on 5/23/2024 to add applying attorney's name (cc3). (Entered: 05/22/2024)
05/07/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Sealed Document filed (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (cc3) (Entered: 05/07/2024)
05/06/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order GRANTING 34 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Response, (Dkt. 34-1), and its exhibit, (Dkt. 34-2), under seal. Plaintiff already filed an unsealed, redacted version of the Response, (Dkt. 30). There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/06/2024) Text Order GRANTING 34 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the Response, (Dkt. 34-1), and its exhibit, (Dkt. 34-2), under seal. Plaintiff already filed an unsealed, redacted version of the Response, (Dkt. 30). There is no need to file redacted exhibits. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/06/2024)
05/03/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	CORRECTED Motion for leave to File Sealed Document (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Opposition to Casetifys Motion to Stay Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of the Asserted Patents, # 2 Exhibit B - Declaration of David K. Ludwig, # 3 Proposed Order) (Ohanian, Henry) (Entered: 05/03/2024)
05/03/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order DENYING 29 Motion for Leave to File Response Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its response under seal is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court's Local Rules. All documents intended to be kept under seal must be filed as an exhibit to a sealing motion as described in W.D. Loc. R. CV-5.2. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/03/2024) Text Order DENYING 29 Motion for Leave to File Response Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its response under seal is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court's Local Rules. All documents intended to be kept under seal must be filed as an exhibit to a sealing motion as described in W.D. Loc. R. CV-5.2. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/03/2024)
05/03/24	Speculative Product Design LLC v. Casetagram Ltd 1:23-CV-01171 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order DENYING 31 Motion for Leave to File Response Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its response under seal is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court's Local Rules. All documents intended to be kept under seal must be filed as an exhibit to a sealing motion as described in W.D. Loc. R. CV-5.2. The sealed document must not be filed with the submission. Instead, the sealed document must be separately filed as an exhibit to a motion requesting permission to keep the document under seal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/03/2024) Text Order DENYING 31 Motion for Leave to File Response Under Seal entered by Judge Robert Pitman. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its response under seal is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with this Court's Local Rules. All documents intended to be kept under seal must be filed as an exhibit to a sealing motion as described in W.D. Loc. R. CV-5.2. The sealed document must not be filed with the submission. Instead, the sealed document must be separately filed as an exhibit to a motion requesting permission to keep the document under seal. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jmlc) (Entered: 05/03/2024)