Chervon Ltd

General

Total Cases27
Active Cases6
Patents276
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
PTAB

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
L5
B
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
07/29/24
REQUEST for Oral Argument by Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. re 396 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Robert McSorley. (Biggs, Brian) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
07/29/24
REQUEST for Oral Argument by Homelite Consumer Products, Inc., One World Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. re 396 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Robert McSorley. (Biggs, Brian) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
07/29/24
Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Brian A. Biggs regarding Reply in Support of Defendants Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Plaintiffs Damages Expert Robert McSorley - re 396 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Robert McSorley. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit K, # 2 Exhibit L)(Biggs, Brian) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
07/29/24
Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Brian A. Biggs regarding Reply in Support of Defendants Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Plaintiffs Damages Expert Robert McSorley - re 396 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Plaintiffs' Damages Expert Robert McSorley. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit K, # 2 Exhibit L)(Biggs, Brian) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re 404 MOTION to Preclude [Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Opinions and Testimony], 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct filed by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re 404 MOTION to Preclude [Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Opinions and Testimony], 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct filed by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re 404 MOTION to Preclude [Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Opinions and Testimony], 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct filed by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re 404 MOTION to Preclude [Plaintiffs' Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Expert Opinions and Testimony], 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct filed by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] STATEMENT re 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc.. (Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
07/26/24
[SEALED] STATEMENT re 402 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of the IPR Patents are Not Invalid As Obvious, 401 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 - Summary Judgment of Infringement, 403 MOTION for Summary Judgment No 4. - Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 400 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 - Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct by Chervon (HK) Limited, Chervon North America Inc.. (Delcollo, Renee) (Entered: 07/26/2024)