City Of San Antonio

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents--

CourtsW.D. Texas

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

--

--

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

L1

C

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
12/20/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Xavier Rodriguez: Status Conference held on 12/15/2022 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Gigi Simcox.)(wg) (Entered: 12/20/2022)
12/15/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order DENYING 75 Motion to Amend Complaint; DENYING 75 Motion to Lift Stay; DENYING 75 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiffs Motion is denied for reasons stated in open court, namely that a relevant patent in this case remains pending before the Federal Circuit. The stay will remain in place so that all issues before the Federal Circuit may be appropriately resolved. Furthermore, all claims brought by Plaintiff Ubiquitous are DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to obtain counsel, despite this Court's order to do so. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (szlc) (Entered: 12/15/2022) Text Order DENYING 75 Motion to Amend Complaint; DENYING 75 Motion to Lift Stay; DENYING 75 Motion to Dismiss entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiffs Motion is denied for reasons stated in open court, namely that a relevant patent in this case remains pending before the Federal Circuit. The stay will remain in place so that all issues before the Federal Circuit may be appropriately resolved. Furthermore, all claims brought by Plaintiff Ubiquitous are DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to obtain counsel, despite this Court's order to do so. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (szlc) (Entered: 12/15/2022)
12/02/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by City Service Board of San Antonio, City of San Antonio for proceedings held on 08/24/2022. Proceedings Transcribed: 11/08/2022. Court Reporter: Gigi Simcox. (Talebi, Rodeen) (Entered: 12/02/2022)
11/30/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS, ( Status Conference set for 12/15/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez,). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg) (Entered: 11/30/2022)
11/29/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN RESPONSE to 77 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion by Charles Shamoon. (wg) (Entered: 11/29/2022)
11/21/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by City Service Board of San Antonio, City of San Antonio, re 75 MOTION to Amend Complaint MOTION to Lift Stay MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Charles Shamoon (Pleune, Scott) (Entered: 11/21/2022)
11/15/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Pro-se Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Order by Charles Shamoon. (wg) (Entered: 11/15/2022)
11/15/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	PRO-SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION to Amend Complaint, MOTION to Lift Stay, MOTION to Dismiss by Charles Shamoon. (wg) (Entered: 11/15/2022)
11/08/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Transcript filed of Proceedings held on 8-24-22, Proceedings Transcribed: Motion Hearing. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Gigi Simcox, Telephone number: 210-244-5037, gigi_simcox@gmail.com. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript to ensure compliance with the FRCP 5.2(a)/FRCrP 49.1(a). A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Notice of Redaction Request must be filed within 21 days. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 11/29/2022, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/9/2022, Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/6/2023, (gs) (Entered: 11/08/2022) Transcript filed of Proceedings held on 8-24-22, Proceedings Transcribed: Motion Hearing. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Gigi Simcox, Telephone number: 210-244-5037, gigi_simcox@gmail.com. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript to ensure compliance with the FRCP 5.2(a)/FRCrP 49.1(a). A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Notice of Redaction Request must be filed within 21 days. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 11/29/2022, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/9/2022, Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/6/2023, (gs) (Entered: 11/08/2022)
10/19/22	Ubiquitous Connectivity LP v. City Of San Antonio 5:18-CV-00718 ( W.D. TX )	Text Order DENYING 71 Motion to Lift Stay entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiff has represented that he will dismiss his appeal, in whole or in part, currently pending before the Federal Circuit. However, there is no indication that said appeal has been dismissed. Accordingly, the stay must remain in place so that all issues before the Federal Circuit may be appropriately resolved. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (szlc) (Entered: 10/19/2022) Text Order DENYING 71 Motion to Lift Stay entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Plaintiff has represented that he will dismiss his appeal, in whole or in part, currently pending before the Federal Circuit. However, there is no indication that said appeal has been dismissed. Accordingly, the stay must remain in place so that all issues before the Federal Circuit may be appropriately resolved. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (szlc) (Entered: 10/19/2022)