Coretek Licensing LLC

General

Total Cases49
Active Cases--
Patents4
TypeNPE
Elite Ratings
--
--
--
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
L5
A
PTAB
L5
E
CAFC
L3
E

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
05/23/23
Case reassigned to Judge Robert Pitman. Judge Lee Yeakel no longer assigned to the case. (klw) (Entered: 05/23/2023)
05/23/23
Case reassigned to Judge Robert Pitman. Judge Lee Yeakel no longer assigned to the case. (klw) (Entered: 05/23/2023)
05/12/23
ORDER for Dismissal. The above-captioned matter is dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs, by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 5/12/2023. (angar, ) (Entered: 05/12/2023)
05/12/23
STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case with Prejudice by Plaintiff Coretek Licensing LLC. (Curfman, Andrew) (Entered: 05/12/2023)
05/03/23
Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jv2) (Entered: 05/03/2023)
05/03/23
ORDER re 24 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. As nothing remains to resolve, IT IS ORDERED that the case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Robert Pitman. (jv2) (Entered: 05/03/2023)
04/27/23
STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Coretek Licensing LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Curfman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/27/2023)
04/25/23
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Talkspace, Inc.. Document filed by Coretek Licensing LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Curfman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/12/23
AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a final decision was rendered on 4/12/2023 in a court action filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (Attachments: # 1 Order of Dismissal).(ks) (Entered: 04/12/2023)
04/12/23
ORDER: It having been reported to this Court that the parties have settled this action, it is, on this 12th day of April, 2023, hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 60 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/12/2023) (ks) (Entered: 04/12/2023)