Crystal Lagoons US Corp

General

Total Cases7
Active Cases1
Patents43
TypeOperating Company
Elite Ratings
--

Ratings

Experience
Grade
Trend
DCT
--
--
--
PTAB
--
--
--
CAFC
--
--
--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered
Case
Description
07/22/24
Defendant's MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re 437 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, Exhibits 36 and 37 filed by Defendant Cloward H2O, Consol Defendant Pacific Aquascape International. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Braithwaite, Jared) (Entered: 07/22/2024)
07/16/24
DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Plaintiffs' 438 and 440 Motions for Leave to File Under Seal state that the sole basis for seeking to file some of the documents at issue under seal is because they contain information that Defendants have designated as "Confidential" or "Attorneys Eyes Only." Accordingly, if Defendants seek to have those documents sealed, they must comply with DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i) ("If the sole basis for proposing that the Document be sealed is that another party designated it as confidential or for attorneys' eyes only, then so state that reason in the motion. If the designating party seeks to have the Document sealed, the designating party must file a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal in accordance with DUCivR 5-3(b)(2) within seven (7) days of service of the motion. If the designating party does not file a motion within seven (7) days, the original motion may be denied, and the Document may be unsealed without further notice."). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 7/16/2024. No attached document.(gdr) (Entered: 07/16/2024)
07/15/24
Amended MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re 437 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Consol Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons US Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Corrected Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to File Under Seal) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Byers, Doyle) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
07/15/24
**SEALED DOCUMENT** re 437 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Consol Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons US CorpNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 36 Severson - SEALED, # 2 Exhibit 37 Begay - SEALED, # 3 Exhibit 38 Grimau, # 4 Exhibit 39 Cherasia, # 5 Exhibit 40 Cloward, # 6 Exhibit 41 Company Disclosure - SEALED, # 7 Exhibit 41 De la Cerda Declaration)(Byers, Doyle) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
07/15/24
MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re 437 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Consol Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons US Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Byers, Doyle) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
07/15/24
Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 378 Redacted MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support [Consolidated] filed by Consol Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons US Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 36, # 2 Exhibit 37, # 3 Exhibit 38 Grimau, # 4 Exhibit 39 Cherasia, # 5 Exhibit 40 Cloward, # 6 Exhibit 41, # 7 Exhibit 42 De la Cerda Declaration, etc.)(Byers, Doyle) (Entered: 07/15/2024)
07/05/24
Modification of Docket: re 436 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief. Docket entry modified from a Miscellaneous Relief Motion to a Motion for Leave to File. No further action is needed, please note for future reference. (kpf) (Entered: 07/05/2024)
07/03/24
MOTION for Leave to File: re 435 Order Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal filed by Consol Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons Technologies, Plaintiff Crystal Lagoons US Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Byers, Doyle) Modified to change event type and add text on 7/5/2024 (kpf). (Entered: 07/03/2024)
07/01/24
DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Defendant's 429 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document seeks to seal certain portions of Defendant's 428 Reply Brief to its Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Richard F. Bero, solely on the basis that the Reply contains information designated as confidential or attorneys' eyes only by a party. Such designations are insufficient to warrant sealing the exhibits. See DUCivR 5-3(a)(1). Any party (including Defendant) seeking to keep the unredacted version of the Reply sealed must file a motion within seven days "specify[ing] why the Document is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law." DUCivR 5-3(b)(2). If no such motion is filed, the Reply may be unsealed without further notice. See DUCivR 5-3(b)(2)(C)(i). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 7/1/2024. No attached document.(gdr) (Entered: 07/01/2024)
06/28/24
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 232 Redacted MOTION to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Jennifer Norlin and Memorandum in Support to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Jennifer Norlin, 375 Redacted MOTION to Exclude Plaintiffs' Expert Jennifer Norlin and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Cloward H2O, Consol Defendant Pacific Aquascape International. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit US Patent No. 8,753,520, # 2 Exhibit US Patent No. 9,708,822)(Braithwaite, Jared) (Entered: 06/28/2024)