Dango Products LLC

General

Total Cases2

Active Cases--

Patents12

CourtsD. Minnesota

TypeOperating Company

Elite Ratings

--

dangoproducts.com

--

Ratings

Experience

Grade

Trend

DCT

--

--

--

PTAB

--

--

--

CAFC

--

--

--

Analytics

Cases

Litigated Patents

Ratings Trends

Recent Dockets

Entered	Case	Description
07/27/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	REPORT ON DETERMINATION OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing.) (kt)
07/19/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	Final Civil Docket 07-19-2022
07/18/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dango Products, LLC (Schwie, Wesley)
07/18/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dango Products, LLC (Schwie, Wesley) (Entered: 07/18/2022)
06/22/22	Dango Products LLC v. Zeeker 0:21-CV-02357 ( D. MN )	Initial Civil Docket 10-22-2021
06/17/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dango Products, LLC re [48] Proposed Order to Judge - Other, [47] Letter to Magistrate Judge (Schwie, Wesley)
06/17/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dango Products, LLC re 48 Proposed Order to Judge - Other, 47 Letter to Magistrate Judge (Schwie, Wesley) (Entered: 06/17/2022)
06/17/22	Dango Products LLC v. Zeeker 0:21-CV-02357 ( D. MN )	CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dango Products, LLC re 18 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Schwie, Wesley) (Entered: 06/17/2022)
06/16/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	(Text-Only) ORDER in Response to [47] Letter to Magistrate Judge. In response to Plaintiff's Letter, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant a 30-day extension to Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint because Plaintiff represents that the parties are in productive settlement negotiations. Therefore, Defendant's answer/response is due on or before Friday, July 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/16/2022. (JLD) (Text-Only) ORDER in Response to [47] Letter to Magistrate Judge. In response to Plaintiff's Letter, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant a 30-day extension to Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint because Plaintiff represents that the parties are in productive settlement negotiations. Therefore, Defendant's answer/response is due on or before Friday, July 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/16/2022. (JLD)
06/16/22	Dango Products LLC v. Muradin 0:21-CV-00901 ( D. MN )	(Text-Only) ORDER in Response to 47 Letter to Magistrate Judge. In response to Plaintiff`s Letter, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant a 30-day extension to Defendant`s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff`s Second Amended Complaint because Plaintiff represents that the parties are in productive settlement negotiations. Therefore, Defendant`s answer/response is due on or before Friday, July 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/16/2022. (JLD) (Entered: 06/16/2022) (Text-Only) ORDER in Response to 47 Letter to Magistrate Judge. In response to Plaintiff`s Letter, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant a 30-day extension to Defendant`s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff`s Second Amended Complaint because Plaintiff represents that the parties are in productive settlement negotiations. Therefore, Defendant`s answer/response is due on or before Friday, July 15, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/16/2022. (JLD) (Entered: 06/16/2022)